Author Topic: Kitchen telephone  (Read 34407 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #525 on: June 24, 2017, 12:52:PM »
You have been told many times that the tone was the SAME - any naivety resides with you.





I can't help it if I DON'T believe all I'm told,or all that's written. I'm not easily fooled.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #526 on: June 24, 2017, 12:54:PM »
Because the engaged tone and the off the hook tone were the same. I posted proof of this before but you just close your eyes and ears to it.





An engaged tone and a tone off the hook are two DIFFERENT tones !!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #527 on: June 24, 2017, 12:56:PM »
Were any of you aware in the 80's of rotary dialling telephones and their different tones ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #528 on: June 24, 2017, 12:58:PM »



Just because I pick-up on something doesn't mean that you prefer to continue in that vain of conversation in order to avoid what I've asked originally.

Picked up on what? The tone for engaged because someone is speaking on the phone or it being off the hook was the same. You have been told this before but you just keep repeating that there was a difference anyway. Maldon was one of the LAST exchanges to be updated - it's a FACT!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #529 on: June 24, 2017, 12:59:PM »




An engaged tone and a tone off the hook are two DIFFERENT tones !!

No they weren't and I have posted the proof MANY times. I won't post it again while certain quarters are living in denial.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #530 on: June 24, 2017, 02:39:PM »
We know there were recordings of the call/calls so why weren't they played in court, if they had nothing to hide this would have sealed it.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27075
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #531 on: June 24, 2017, 03:39:PM »
We know there were recordings of the call/calls so why weren't they played in court, if they had nothing to hide this would have sealed it.

Do we?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #532 on: June 25, 2017, 03:31:AM »
We know there were recordings of the call/calls . . .
Bonnett asserted later that "all radio and telephone messages are recorded on audio tape", which presumably referred to such messages handled in the HQ information room where he worked. That doesn't imply there was a similar practice at Chelmsford police station.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12617
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #533 on: June 26, 2017, 12:29:AM »
Bonnett asserted later that "all radio and telephone messages are recorded on audio tape", which presumably referred to such messages handled in the HQ information room where he worked. That doesn't imply there was a similar practice at Chelmsford police station.

A logical consequence based on a presumption cannot be taken to imply that there was or wasn't.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16117
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #534 on: June 29, 2017, 11:41:PM »
Is this of any relevance?






Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #535 on: June 30, 2017, 09:00:AM »
Thanks Roch.

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #536 on: June 30, 2017, 04:02:PM »
Did Burrell request two checks without even dialling the number? That seems unlikely. How would he know what happened at 06:09?