Author Topic: Kitchen telephone  (Read 4419 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #30 on: May 26, 2017, 10:15:PM »
It's funny how sources of quotes takes on an importance when it suits. I remember the allegation document from about six or seven years ago. It was extensively referenced. A fact which Hartley remained very aloof about. You cant have it both ways.

Unbelievable. Everyone who reads this thread would like to know more

I am quite sure they are referencing the phone and I would like Bill to post more about this

It's called having an open mind

Offline Steve_uk

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8403
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #31 on: May 26, 2017, 11:10:PM »
Is there a source for Bill's statement? I believe there was a lot of blood on the kitchen floor, of which there are no photographs, hence the possible confusion.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4410
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #32 on: May 27, 2017, 01:22:AM »
Is there a source for Bill's statement? I believe there was a lot of blood on the kitchen floor, of which there are no photographs, hence the possible confusion.

I believe Colin rang WHF on the morning of the murders and a policeman answered the phone. Thus a phone was handled by the police.

I cannot remember where I read this or whether its true or not.
"The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

Offline Steve_uk

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8403
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #33 on: May 27, 2017, 01:54:AM »
I believe Colin rang WHF on the morning of the murders and a policeman answered the phone. Thus a phone was handled by the police.

I cannot remember where I read this or whether its true or not.
There's nothing about this in Colin's book. He was escorted to White House Farm almost immediately with Heather.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4410
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #34 on: May 27, 2017, 03:00:AM »
There's nothing about this in Colin's book. He was escorted to White House Farm almost immediately with Heather.

Page 56,57 it was Colins dad who rang WHF and police answered. (apparently)
"The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

Offline Steve_uk

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8403
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #35 on: May 27, 2017, 03:12:AM »
Page 56,57 it was Colins dad who rang WHF and police answered. (apparently)
Yes but they were at Bourtree Cottage, not the crime scene.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4410
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #36 on: May 27, 2017, 04:07:AM »
Yes but they were at Bourtree Cottage, not the crime scene.

This is all I have to go on.
"The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is."

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12691
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #37 on: May 27, 2017, 11:23:AM »
Have removed more posts from this thread.  Some of the posts I removed were not abusive but were way off topic.
I believe Bill's thread is an interesting subject for debate so tried to keep the essence of it on track.

Offline Hartley.

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2119
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #38 on: May 27, 2017, 11:46:AM »
Page 56,57 it was Colins dad who rang WHF and police answered. (apparently)

Does it say it was on the morning after the murders?

Offline Hartley.

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2119
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #39 on: May 27, 2017, 11:54:AM »
Does it say it was on the morning after the murders?

Colin didn't complete his statement until 5:30pm (according to his statement).

So I think David's implied suggestion is off the mark.  :-\

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 19148
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #40 on: May 27, 2017, 12:50:PM »
Page 56,57 it was Colins dad who rang WHF and police answered. (apparently)

Page 56, 57 of what?
100% - No doubts!

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38399
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #41 on: May 27, 2017, 12:55:PM »
Have removed more posts from this thread.  Some of the posts I removed were not abusive but were way off topic.
I believe Bill's thread is an interesting subject for debate so tried to keep the essence of it on track.

Well done, Maggie...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline justice

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #42 on: May 27, 2017, 01:24:PM »
6 August 2002 Stokenchurch investigation. Room 101 Trenchard House. DS 21 Stanley Jones speaking to DCI Jeannette McDiarmid about the kitchen telephone.

Jones) “I can’t even see anybody using the phone in that kitchen, the state of it, do you know what I mean. There’s no way I want to use that phone”

Every known photograph of the ivory coloured kitchen phone, including those on this website, shows the phone in pristine condition. What could Jones have meant by "the state of it"? Blood all over it?
Hi Bill, is this the information you referred to earlier?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373230.html#msg373230

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373234.html#msg373234

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373240.html#msg373240.

Is this the start of the information that will aquit Jeremy? 


Envy kills,” the Pope said. “It does not tolerate others having something that I do not have. And it always suffers, because the heart of an envious or jealous person suffers. It is a suffering heart!” It is a suffering that desires “the death of others

Offline Steve_uk

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8403
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #43 on: May 27, 2017, 01:33:PM »
This is all I have to go on.
It's false information.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15498
Re: Kitchen telephone
« Reply #44 on: May 27, 2017, 01:36:PM »
Hi Bill, is this the information you referred to earlier?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373230.html#msg373230

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373234.html#msg373234

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7867.msg373240.html#msg373240.

Is this the start of the information that will aquit Jeremy?

Hi Justice any evidence that has been uncovered to free Jeremy will not be posted on the forum by Bill or indeed anyone else not at this stage :))