So in your world, it's OK to hate killers and yet on the JB board you condemn those who believe that Jeremy is guilty simply for saying he's guilty. You admit you would want him to die in prison if guilty but condemn those who think he is guilty and refer to him in those terms. Bit hypocritical!
Jeremy can't be rehabilitated until he accepts responsibility for what he did and owns up to it.
Not hypocritical,just let's wait and see what these latest forensic tests throw up one way or the other.
Because I'm sure that he's innocent and by some quirk it ends up that he isn't,then I wouldn't lose sleep over his fate.
This has been the oddest of cases in that 30 years have passed and there has remained to be doubt over his conviction,something which I can't be hypocritical about because where there's uncertainty you can't say yea or nay,except in my case it's a definite nay,and yours a yea,so I can't understand your remark about hypocrisy.
If there'd been no doubt whatsoever and ALL tests had reached that conclusion,then it would have been a yea from me.
Take Death Row in the States. How many have served 20,30,40 years only to have been found innocent ? The very mention of Death Row leads EVERYONE to believe that it's where those who committed heinous crimes should remain,but there are always that small % who didn't and if in doubt,investigate every avenue until you're satisfied that the outcome will be the right one before they're put to death.
I couldn't care less when the right ones ( offenders ) receive their comeuppance----------they won't murder again that's for sure,but for God's sake get it right the first time. That applies to this country too.