Sorry I don't accept this and I will not be taking you up on the email offer. The only opportunity Lundy had to murder his wife and child and to establish an alibi was his fortnightly business trip to Wellington and it's too coincidental in my opinion that that's when the murders occurred. It's the usual motive of killing for money. There's more about the vineyard deal here. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/66259690/mark-lundy-murder-retrial-focus-on-vineyard-plans
In that case I will post a link to a google doc which will require you to wallow deliberately in an evidence free swamp when discussing the case, and you can be like any ise Italian judge declaring the earth is tghe center of the universe.
Meanwhile:
What do you make of this excerpt from Hislop summing up for the defence?
" And it might provide an explanation also, might it not, for the unidentified footprint? It might, might it not, provide and explanation for the fibres under both Christine and Amber Lundy’s fingernails, inconsistent with Mark Lundy’s clothing? It might, might it not, be consistent, this impossibility be consistent and provide some explanation as to why it is that Amber Lundy and Christine Lundy have the
Y-STR of a male stranger underneath their nails, and that's the consequences of the impossibilities."
You see, Christine was fighting her attacker from a prone position, the daughter woke and tried to drag him from her mum!