0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
hi all im new to this foum stuff sorry if i was supposed to post here first .Been reading a lot on this case recently and it has caught my interest.This is not because i have any feelings one way or another whether JB is guilty or innocentbut just on the fact the evidence presented leaves so much to circumstantial evidence and little to fact.i do not understand how any defence of this case would not be successful.It just concerns me that not only in the case that in others how it is so easy for police to convict on assumption of guilt.The police took a dislike to JB and this tainted there opinion of the evidence especially the testimony of julie Mugford.again sorry for not posting here first
i will try maggie as i said its not something i do much off but sometimes you just feel that to few poeple have to many powers and MOJs are becoming more prevelent
Stacey Hyde, Donna Anthony,Sally Clark, Mahmood Hussein Mattan, Birmingham Six,Stephen DowningBarry Georgeneed i go on
prevalent as more the info on these cases with social media are easier to find info on. If you believe that police do not make great mistakes and miscarriages of justice then you must walk about with your eyes closed. Once the police make up there mind that you are guilty no matter what the evidence or logic of the situation is they minds are closed.Im sue that they try there best and it is a very difficult job but the standard of policing and the attitude of some of the staff are very close mindedMost people these days are tried by social media.With forensic science being relied on more and more it becomes easier for evidence not being able to be refuted .We are losing the idea that someone is assumed innocent. It frightens me i suppose im just being paranoid
lol yes i did something wrong i got into a daft conversation with you lolDosent it bother you that with little or no evidence people are convicted.i suppose i need to give u examples again. It just frightens me that poeple are so quick to make judgments especially on socialmedia and forums. People should be convicted on evidence factual evidence not hearsay evidence