Author Topic: The Money Video  (Read 1690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: The Money Video
« Reply #15 on: February 01, 2020, 12:29:PM »
Can we stick to the issue of money?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17937
Re: The Money Video
« Reply #16 on: February 01, 2020, 12:31:PM »





Why are you guilts so quick on the offensive ??
I was countering your attempted smear.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Money Video
« Reply #17 on: February 01, 2020, 12:33:PM »
Yes, a bit like Jeremy telling police that Sheila had recently indulged in target practice.


Would be good to see the statements from the next day , not weeks later to see if that’s true . Oh yes not available .

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17937
Re: The Money Video
« Reply #18 on: February 01, 2020, 12:34:PM »

Would be good to see the statements from the next day , not weeks later to see if that’s true . Oh yes not available .
That line was in the ITV drama. I would have thought it was accurate.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
Re: The Money Video
« Reply #19 on: February 01, 2020, 01:01:PM »
She is . But won’t come on here.

Totally understand Jane
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
Re: The Money Video
« Reply #20 on: February 01, 2020, 01:05:PM »
She is . But won’t come on here.

I’m not going to ask you any questions Jan but I take it she is a genuine person then
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000