It proves absolutely nothing whatsoever and the only one with an agenda here is you - which is why you often sift through my posts - I seem to be the only person who rattles your cage. You are clearly bothered by the arguments I make - I should be flattered but I also find it a bit weird. You try too hard gringo - Jeremy tried to sell the pictures and nothing will change that!
No sifting of any posts is required to know that your argument is that Jeremy tried to sell the pictures and that this is proven by the fact that he allegedly used the same words to describe the pictures to Fielder as he had to Colin. You repeat it parrot fashion every other post so no sifting required, Caroline.
So how does Jeremy allegedly using the same words to Colin and Fielder prove that he tried to sell porn pictures of his dead sister?, but Colin attributing the same words to Jeremy as the police had supposedly paraphrased on a log prove nothing? Why is one suspicious and not the other? How is it that you are not suspicious of a story by proven serial liars that has no corroboration despite your spurious claim that Colin can in any way prove this story. He can't, he wasn't there and the alleged coincidence of them being described in the same way doesn't prove a thing. It is desperate that all that is left of the argument now is one piece of, at best, circumstantial evidence.
I can assure you that you amuse me (albeit unintentionally) rather than rattle my cage. Your arguments, such as they are, consist largely of ad hom attacks and misrepresentations of others views rather than actual debate.