It would be useful if someone could type this out verbatim. I can make out most of it. Hammersley says that he took possession of a silencer AE/1 and a telescopic sight AE/2, If I'm not mistaken.
I have been telling everyone for decades now, that the silencer relied upon during the trial (DRB/1, Court Exhibit no.9) was originally handed over to DC Oakey by Ann Eaton on 11th September 1985, which originally had the exhibit reference of AE/1, and that the other exhibits she handed over to police on this occasion were AE/2, AE/3 and AE/4, which subsequently had their exhibit reference altered into CAE/1, CAE/2, CAE/3 and CAE/4, then altered again when the police interfered with these and changed them into exhibits DRB/1, DRB/2, DRB/3 and DRB/4. As if all of this wasn't confusing enough, police then changed some of them into exhibit references HGO/1(a), HGO/1(b) and HGO/2, etc, etc, etc (leaving the silencer as DRB/1)..
These alterations were deliberately introduced to try and prevent anyone finding out about the true historical background about where the silencer marked by the exhibit reference 'DRB/1' came from, who found it, who handed it over to the police, when it was first fingerprinted, when it was first submitted to Huntingdon Laboratory, and when it was first examined by experts at the Lab'...
What I have been able to do, is to trace it's (DRB/1) history, all the way back to the time of the shooting tragedy at whf, and to prove that Sheila Caffell's blood was found to have been present inside a silencer (DB/1 - 23) which was present at the Lab' on the 12th September 1985 ( a silencer which had been present at Huntingdon Lab' from 30th August 1985), could not possibly have been a present inside this (DRB/1) silencer at the Lab' on that particular date, by virtue of the fact that the silencer bearing the exhibit reference DRB/1 ( previously also referred to by the exhibit references CAE/1, AE/1) was not at the Lab' any time sooner than the 20th September 1985, and that 'it' did not get examined by any expert there until the 25th September 1985! This means in the clearest terms imaginable that the court which tried Jeremy Bamber for the murders of five members of his family were dishonestly decieved, in particular, Bambers legal team, and the jury were led down the garden path, by the antics of Essex police and the prosecution services, because the key exhibit (DRB/1) in the entire proceedings was nothing but a red herrin' - you can't possibly use 'a prop' (which was what 'this' silencer was) in the prosecution of somebody, facing counts of multiple murders, and claim that the convictions can be justified and are legitimate, once it has been exposed as 'faked' evidence! I have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that 'this' silencer (DRB/1, Court Exhibit No.9) relied upon during the trial of Jeremy Bamber could 'not possibly have been the silencer' inside which it was falsely (as it turns out) claimed had been found the unique blood of Sheila Caffell, a false flag piece of evidence, purporting to prove that Sheila Caffell could not possibly have killed herself with 'this' silencer attached to the end of the guns barrel, fell down dead on the bedroom floor, and at sometime thereafter, she had taken off 'this' silencer in question (that silencer being DRB/1, Court Exhibit no.9), walked all the way downstairs to the den, concealed 'it' (DRB/1) in a box in the gun cupboard, and then gone back upstairs to the main bedroom, only to lay down dead again on the floor in possession of the rifle, now minus the (DRB/1) aforementioned silencer! The fact is that she hadn't done this with that (DRB/1) silencer, and the fact is that neither Jeremy Bamber, nor any third party involved in Sheila's death, had done this with that (DRB/1) silencer!
This deception was something which Essex police and other interested parties deliberately sought to pull off, and there must have been a reason for them having all pulled their own weight toward fooling everyone into relying upon this (DRB/1) silencers existence, as some sort of proof that (a) Sheila hadn't killed herself, and (b) that Jeremy Bamber, was the killer, because as the trial judge said in his summing up, (c) there was 'no evidence of any third party involvement in these murders', it had to have been either Sheila, or Jeremy!
The absolute truth in this matter, was that the police were the third party involvement in Sheila Caffell's death!
Not only do the various contents recorded in the individually timed police radio message logs cast doubt on the witness statement version of the events regarding where Sheila Caffell's body had originally been seen, found, and pronounced (wrongly) dead, but the police got themselves into this pickle because a silencer which they had seized (SBJ/1) originally from the scene on the first morning of the shooting tragedy was subsequently returned back to the farmhouse on the evening of Friday, 9th August 1985, only for 'it' (SBJ/1) to be re-seized along with a second silencer (AE/1, CAE/1, DRB/1) by David Boutflour from the gun cupboard on the following day (10th August 1985). On the evening of 12th August 1985, Peter Eaton had handed over one (SBJ/1) of these two silencers (the one believed to have been owned by Anthony Pargeter) to DS Jones, the second silencer (AE/1, CAE/1, DRB/1) which was not handed over by Ann Eaton until 11th September 1985, was owned by the Bambers and was purchased in November 1985 - the unique blood belonging to Sheila Caffell could not have been found inside the silencer (DRB/1) belonging to the anshuzt rifle, if it was found inside any silencer at all, it could only have been found inside the other silencer (SBJ/1), the one belonging to Anthony Pargeters bolt action rifle!!!
please note, that any reference to the first silencer bearing the exhibit reference of SBJ/1, should also be treated as reference to the same silencer, mentioned at different times in the police file, as SJ/1 and DB/1. Similarly, any reference to the other silencer DRB/1, should also be referred to as CAE/1, and AE/1...