Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 723097 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
no killer would want the body to found or be anywhere near the body when it was found.

if hes storys not true how come the rest of search party backed it up.

h

im not saying his stories not true about the dog finding the body on the way back down the path

i want to know why it didnt find the body on the way up the path?

it must have walked right past the exact same spot. No one was there other than the dog and luke on the way up, its consistant with the dog smelling the body on the way down, that the dog must have alerted luke to the body on the way up also, so why didnt luke discover it on the way up?



can i ask if anyone else on here believes luke to be guilty

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
probably because he wasnt in charge of the search party jodis grandmother was and he was following them and pulling the dog along till jodis grandmother decided to search the path agian.

Offline lonny

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
If you tell everyone and convince yourself of something for almost 9 years, repeating it will have no affect on a lie detector test.

Please post the evidence for this

Janet

  • Guest
I would like to see this evidence too

Janet

  • Guest
im not saying his stories not true about the dog finding the body on the way back down the path

i want to know why it didnt find the body on the way up the path?

it must have walked right past the exact same spot. No one was there other than the dog and luke on the way up, its consistant with the dog smelling the body on the way down, that the dog must have alerted luke to the body on the way up also, so why didnt luke discover it on the way up?



can i ask if anyone else on here believes luke to be guilty

I used to think he was guilty now I do not.

Offline gordo30

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
I believe Luke had a call from Jodi's mum that it was arranged that he make his way to her house by going up the same route he felt Jodi would have came down should she have been on her way at some point to his house. This was not a casual stroll with the dog, this was someone who had if you like an appointment and a place to be and was worried that Jodi had not been seen at all since she left the house before 5pm.

It would not be natural for Luke let alone any 14 year old to be going through any breaks in walls on a secluded path in darkness on his own, even if the dog had alerted him to some form of smell. FWG put it that the dog would have scented Jodi but then follows on with the lack of DNA of both people on each other after having spent the day with each other. Is it possible then that the dog would have scented Jodi off Luke? and therefore until the dog was asked to find Jodi it would have followed the course of its handler no matter what it scented on the way up.

Offline gordo30

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
im not doubting the dog 'found' the body, i would expect a dog to smell a dead body/blood. What i want to know is why it didnt smell it passing it on the way up. (im guessing it probably did, why then didnt luke go over the wall then? he probably just tugged at the dog to keep coming... he didnt want to find the body at this time, he wanted to find it with the family to appear innocent)

I also find this rather misleading as it was not Luke in control of the search party,he could not have known that they would have went back down the path he had just came up, I have heard that it was Jodi's gran who suggested they go back the way he came, this idea that he could of and didn't so brilliantly carry out a plan when so many variables were outwith his control amazes me.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
well it was tracker dog so it would tend to sniff on comand

pluss what it could do depend on how he was holding the lead.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
I also find this rather misleading as it was not Luke in control of the search party,he could not have known that they would have went back down the path he had just came up, I have heard that it was Jodi's gran who suggested they go back the way he came, this idea that he could of and didn't so brilliantly carry out a plan when so many variables were outwith his control amazes me.

your right it was gran in charge of the search party.

Janet

  • Guest
can I ask why someone claiming to support one alleged moj is attacking another alleged moj ? something is not ringing true here



Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
yes thats what i thought janet.

see the thread here that might explian a few things.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2815.15.html
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 03:30:PM by nugnug »

Offline gordo30

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
the mitchells pick n choose when it suits them, lie detectors arent taken seriously in law. funny when police showed their sky interview to the human lie detector in America that his opinion was completely rubbished, yet an unreliable machine is now gospel.

We know that Lie detector tests are not permissible in court but they are of no less and on a personal level more  important than mere circumstantial evidence. Luke's was convicted on nothing more than the weight of circumstantial evidence that seems to be turning full circle when we take into account these lie detector case's.

When you say FWG that the Mitchells seem to rubbish the human lie detector that was Prof Eckman then he did a very good job of that himself when he stated while a consultant on a film set of his profession that he could not tell if Luke Mitchell was lying, he felt that Luke had had so much contempt for the police that he just couldn't tell.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hi Janet  please excuse my ignorance but I am now becoming interested in this case could you just explain what you meant by your post as I said I know very little about it and cannot decide who thinks what.

Janet

  • Guest
Hi Janet  please excuse my ignorance but I am now becoming interested in this case could you just explain what you meant by your post as I said I know very little about it and cannot decide who thinks what.

Do you mean the comment I made re the freewillie person attacking the mitchell case?

If so what I meant is this free willie person posted a thread about this Gage guy and then instead of concentrating on telling people more about the case  which is an alleged moj while using a freewillie user name he/she then begins to attack the mitchell case which is also another alleged moj. I find that odd that someone in the same boat would do this and it looks like someone is out to cause trouble for some reason known only to them.

If freewillie wants to let us know about the case then why can't he/she answer anything?

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hi Janet  I am becoming confused with the freewilly gage and nugnug as I have got to the stage I just don,t know who thinks what about either case think only the two of them are in tune I gather freewillygage thinks luke is guilty and nugnug thinks innocent freewullygage thinks willy gage is innocent and nugnug thinks guilty.  That is what I am picking up.