The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[nugnug]

and that makes him guilty of murder does it becouse he forgot to phone his girlfiend who he would talk to the next day anyway by the same logic you could lock  half the population up.

[FreeWillieGage]

and that makes him guilty of murder does it becouse he forgot to phone his girlfiend who he would talk to the next day anyway by the same logic you could lock half the population up.

no that alone doesnt make him guilty of murder, it makes his actions on the night of the murder regarding hte victim suspicious though. either that or he was lying in that letter about how close he and Jodi were, in that case, ask urself why he would lie about that.

[nugnug]

him and his mum are the only people in this case who have a certificate to prove they dident lie

[FreeWillieGage]

no they don't, no one takes those tests seriously other than chavs on the jeremy kyle show.
Don't you know that guilty killers have passed lie detectors before then been proven to have been lying?

Lukes tracker dog found the body apparently, yet luke and the dog would have had to have passed the body and the same v break in the wall on the way up the path yet he didnt alert him of anything then? only on the way back down? this is proof it was Luke who found the body and not the dog, and this means Luke wanted to lead the family to the body as he wanted to witness their distress and reaction to his 'work'. truly evil.

[nugnug]

there taken very soriously by the probation service they use them to decied weather to relase sex offenders.

[nugnug]

no they don't, no one takes those tests seriously other than chavs on the jeremy kyle show.
Don't you know that guilty killers have passed lie detectors before then been proven to have been lying?

Lukes tracker dog found the body apparently, yet luke and the dog would have had to have passed the body and the same v break in the wall on the way up the path yet he didnt alert him of anything then? only on the way back down? this is proof it was Luke who found the body and not the dog, and this means Luke wanted to lead the family to the body as he wanted to witness their distress and reaction to his 'work'. truly evil.

a dog found sarah pians body a dog finds bodys that are concealed in the woods thats what dogs do.

would anybody suggest that the dog walker who found sarah pains body was involved hin her murder,

[FreeWillieGage]

a dog found sarah pians body a dog finds bodys that are concealed in the woods thats what dogs do.

exactly so why didnt it find the body on the way up the very same path? it would have to have walked right by it, why didnt it smell the body at that point? isn't that "what dogs do"? can you explain that?

[nugnug]

a dog finds the body in most murder cases you read about it the papers all the time a man walking his dog found the body

[FreeWillieGage]

a dog finds the body in most murder cases you read about it the papers all the time a man walking his dog found the body

im aware of this, cant you read? i'm asking why the dog didnt find the body on the way up the path, it would have to have passed to body on the way to meet jodis family

im sure you can understand my question though and are choosing to avoid it because there is no innocent explanation.

[nugnug]

exactly so why didnt it find the body on the way up the very same path? it would have to have walked right by it, why didnt it smell the body at that point? isn't that "what dogs do"? can you explain that?

probably because he relaxed his grip on the lead the rest of the search backed up his story about the dog.

[nugnug]

http://caseblog.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/luke-mitchell-is-innocent/the-finding-of-the-body/

[FreeWillieGage]

probably because he relaxed his grip on the lead the rest of the search backed up his story about the dog.

im not doubting the dog 'found' the body, i would expect a dog to smell a dead body/blood. What i want to know is why it didnt smell it passing it on the way up. (im guessing it probably did, why then didnt luke go over the wall then? he probably just tugged at the dog to keep coming... he didnt want to find the body at this time, he wanted to find it with the family to appear innocent)

[nugnug]

are you saying he could control his dogs sense of smell.

[FreeWillieGage]

are you saying he could control his dogs sense of smell.

what are you talking about

i dont doubt the dog smelled the body, i just presume for it to have done this, it would have had to have smelled it also on the way up the path, why didnt luke and mia discover the body then?

luke wanted to find the body with the search party to appear innocent and perhaps for his own twisted thrills

[nugnug]

no killer would want the body to found or be anywhere near the body when it was found.

if hes storys not true how come the rest of search party backed it up.

on the way back down the path probably had more time to pick up the sent

on the way back down the path luke had also given it a command to seek and being a trcker dog it would of done.

h