Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 723070 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
he was never positively identified by anybody the officer in charge of the investigation admitted that.

im wondering you cliam to be supporting wullie gage but seem to show very little intrest you seem to be more intrested in this one.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2012, 06:10:PM by nugnug »

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
he was never positively identified by anybody the officer in charge of the investigation admitted that.

so who was it then? why didnt they ever come forward? he was identified by a witness and she was a witness at the trial.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
at the trail she couldent point to him even though he was standing right in the dock.

hardly  a  postive id.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2012, 06:14:PM by nugnug »

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
at the trail she couldent point to him even though he was standing right in the dock.

hardly  postive id.


ofcourse not he looked totally different, between 14 and 16 is some of the biggest changes a boy will go through in life

time of the murder



trial






it would have been less credible if she did say he was the same boy she saw, considering the time that had passed and change in appearance. she was just being honest, no reason to be anything other than honest why would she?

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
and whats willie gage got to do with this or my username? willie gage is innocent. i also post in the madeleine mccann case.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710

ofcourse not he looked totally different, between 14 and 16 is some of the biggest changes a boy will go through in life

time of the murder



trial






it would have been less credible if she did say he was the same boy she saw, considering the time that had passed and change in appearance. she was just being honest, no reason to be anything other than honest why would she?

the fact is she couldn'tto point him

she couldent say positively it was him she saw.

dispite the fact his face was all over tewspapers.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2012, 06:20:PM by nugnug »

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
the fact is she couldn't point him

she could say positively it was him she saw.


she couldnt point him because she was being honest in court, he did not look the same, why would she originally lie about seeing him only to change her mind when she got to court?

can you admit you dont actually have a clue weather luke is innocent or guilty?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
im postive that inocent.

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
im postive that inocent.

how can you be sure? im interested in seeing your proof

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i dont have to justify my opionions to you ive have allready stated why im sure his innocent.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
FreeWillyGage  not followed this case very much and I am trying to decide after reading the posts between you and nugnug whether you think Luke is guilty or what.

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
i dont have to justify my opionions to you ive have allready stated why im sure his innocent.

ah so its just an opinion so i was right when i said you dont have a clue weather he did it or not

susan lukes guilty as far as im concerned

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
good attitude nugnug for someone trying to defend luke, whenever someone asks why he's innocent "I dont have to justify myself to you"

jeezo.

Offline FreeWillieGage

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70