Re: OnceSaid
« Result #89 on Oct 24, 2011, 11:20am »
I have been made aware that the poster called OnceSaid is again posting lies on the Bamber forum in a sad attempt to stop me exposing the truth about Mitchell. I will never cease to expose criminals and liars no matter how much garbage these sad cowards dream up.
Their latest effort is to promote the lie that my wife and son somehow gave evidence against me in my trial in September 2004.
The truth being that they were both Defence witnesses but were taken over by the Crown to hamper my legal teams ability to discuss the case with them. They never gave evidence against me in relation to any charges, they have supported me continuously from the moment of my illegal arrest in Spain in August 2003 and continue to do so.
In actual fact they have both given statements as has my brother in support of me to the SCCRC and these are the subject of ongoing legal debate.
This coward who posts as OnceSaid is known to me, I have already provided a copy of their posts to my lawyers who have advised me that they will be pursuing them in due course.
« Last Edit: Oct 24, 2011, 11:22am by John »
Are you Mr Lamberton not a self confessed liar? Did you not admit yourself that you lied to the police in relation to your case? We both know the honest answer to that question, don’t we?. Regardless of how I feel about you I would certainly not deliberately lie about you. As for attempting to stop you “exposing the truth about Mitchell“, that is also untrue. What I object to is you posting your opinion as fact and attempting to mislead readers.
With regards to John Lambertons own case, there was 37 Crown Witnesses, including John Lamberton’s family. There was only ONE defence witness, and that was himself, John Lamberton. Press reports covering the trial all state that his family gave statements and were witnesses against him, he admits himself that there was no defence witnesses, apart from himself, so where exactly have I lied?
Am I to believe all media links that he himself posts as facts in relation to other miscarriages of justices cases that he targets, but ignore and disbelieve press related articles of his own case? (As soon as I find the links where it says that his wife and son in particular gave statements, were at the trial as crown witnesses, gave evidence against him etc, I will post them here). John Lamberton will have in his possession all the newspaper reports relating to his trial, has he made any attempts to sue the newspapers/ journalists/editors who put these words in print over the years?
The following quotes are taken from his own site which features his case.
http://www.justice4johnlamberton.com/thetrial/“The trial continued for a period of some four weeks which was two weeks beyond that allocated. Crown Witnesses numbered some 37 in total although many never gave evidence, the defence were left with only one witness, John himself“.
“Family members who testified including John's brother gave evidence to the effect that John was true to his aunt to the very end when others had failed her abysmally“.
“In a final sinister turn of events just before the commencement of the trial, all John's witnesses from Northern Ireland were handed over to the Crown by a former lawyer simply because he couldn't be bothered to arrange transport and accommodation for them. The Crown had no such constraints however and took these witnesses over formally as Crown Witnesses with the Press later reporting that they had given evidence against John when this was completely untrue and yet another false and prejudiced representation of the facts“.
