Off course she was there but she didn't give any evidence against me. In fact, she has been most helpful in my application to the SCCRC and has been able to provide information which was previously never heard.
The press wrongly assumed that because my wife was designated a Crown Witness that she was there to give evidence against me.
I must also point out yet again that the Press agency who transmitted the story never attended my trial and were never in a position to report what transpired. They gleamed only what the discredited Inland Revenue later told them which was what they wanted them to hear. You will find that every newspaper who carried the story ran with the same content, there was never any independent reporting in my case.
I have previously stated that some of the content is libellous and will be dealt with in due course.