Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 723097 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
he was only doing what other boys his age would of done if they had the chance,

That's right excuse away everything Luke Mitchell ever did that was questionable to say the least.

He was not by any stretch of the imagination a normal teenage boy.

you seem to be takeing a rather unhealthy interest in young people having sex

Janet

  • Guest
well your a convicted conman and your brother a convicted sex offender john what was your mum doing wrong.

storing bottles of piss is an illness some develop when they have a traumatic experience like finding there girlfriends dead body.

ive met fair few people who who have had that illness

a fair few ex soldiers have it.

tut tut nugnug resorting to insults again.
Quote
It was further disclosed that more than 20 bottles of urine were lying around in the squalor of Mitchell’s bedroom. During a previous search, nine months earlier, police had also found more than 20 bottles of urine.

This actually suggests that two sets of urine. One set in an earlier search of the house and 9 months later another 20 bottles.
If this is the case why did his mother not seek help for him when the first 20 bottles were found?
http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Jodi-trial-hears-of-knife.2588863.jp

EDIT: I have re read and re read the wording of the article and it may be that there was only one set of 20 bottles of urine bottles. I am sure if that is the case someone will correct it.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2011, 08:15:PM by Janet »

Janet

  • Guest
he was only doing what other boys his age would of done if they had the chance,

That's right excuse away everything Luke Mitchell ever did that was questionable to say the least.

He was not by any stretch of the imagination a normal teenage boy.


you seem to be takeing a rather unhealthy interest in young people having sex


is that the best retort you can manage? You just do not like anyone pointing out that Mitchell did various things.

I think the unhealthy part in this is how you seem to be very emotionally involved with this when you said you don't even know Mitchell.

clifford

  • Guest
well your a convicted conman and your brother a convicted sex offender john what was your mum doing wrong.

storing bottles of piss is an illness some develop when they have a traumatic experience like finding there girlfriends dead body.

ive met fair few people who who have had that illness

a fair few ex soldiers have it.

tut tut nugnug resorting to insults again.
Quote
It was further disclosed that more than 20 bottles of urine were lying around in the squalor of Mitchell’s bedroom. During a previous search, nine months earlier, police had also found more than 20 bottles of urine.

This actually suggests that two sets of urine. One set in an earlier search of the house and 9 months later another 20 bottles.
If this is the case why did his mother not seek help for him when the first 20 bottles were found?
http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Jodi-trial-hears-of-knife.2588863.jp
Sounds like a really good mother. Did she not clean her house. I think I would have found ") bottles of piss in my kids room. Perhaps she was flogging it to the winos

Janet

  • Guest
Cliff

It must have been totally minging.

http://news.scotsman.com/jodijonesmurder/Urine-under-bed-paints-picture.4092879.jp

Quote
IT was the strong smell of ammonia which first struck detectives when they walked into Luke Mitchell's bedroom.

If that initially puzzled them, then their next discovery would startle even the most hardened investigators.

There lying under the teenager's bed were bottle after bottle of a cloudy liquid, looking suspiciously like urine.

More bottles were hidden away in drawers, some wrapped up in socks. Soon there were 20 bottles lying in front of the bewildered detectives. Lab tests would later show they were the 15-year-old's own urine.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
well your a convicted conman and your brother a convicted sex offender john what was your mum doing wrong.

storing bottles of piss is an illness some develop when they have a traumatic experience like finding there girlfriends dead body.

ive met fair few people who who have had that illness

a fair few ex soldiers have it.

tut tut nugnug resorting to insults again.
Quote
It was further disclosed that more than 20 bottles of urine were lying around in the squalor of Mitchell’s bedroom. During a previous search, nine months earlier, police had also found more than 20 bottles of urine.

This actually suggests that two sets of urine. One set in an earlier search of the house and 9 months later another 20 bottles.
If this is the case why did his mother not seek help for him when the first 20 bottles were found?
http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Jodi-trial-hears-of-knife.2588863.jp

EDIT: I have re read and re read the wording of the article and it may be that there was only one set of 20 bottles of urine bottles. I am sure if that is the case someone will correct it.

resorting to insults ironic or what if people cant take it they shouldent dish it out.

as far as johns concerned im just stateing a fact.

Janet

  • Guest
No nugnug you are not stating a fact about John or anyone else not involved in the case. You are being vindictive just to divert attention away from what is being said about Mitchell.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
SO if you dint know anyone in the case how come your getting so emotional about it.

Janet

  • Guest
SO if you dint know anyone in the case how come your getting so emotional about it.

I am not being emotional about anything. I am discussing the case, but it seems that you are the only one getting her knickers in a knot over anything bad said about Mr Mitchell.

You are the one coming out with outrageous and incoherent statements on here. And you are also attacking people because they are not agreeing with you. Thats what I call getting emotional.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2011, 08:37:PM by Janet »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
read the beginning of the thread it wasn't me who started all the personal stuff

I'm the one asked to justify every opinion i hold on the case.

and your the one who keeps saying facts you dont like are outrageous

Janet

  • Guest
read the beginning of the thread it wasn't me who started all the personal stuff

I'm the one asked to justify every opinion i hold on the case.

and your the one who keeps saying facts you dont like are outrageous

the "facts" as you call the claims about members of the Jones family and others for that matter are not facts at all. That is what I find outrageous. All there is, is total speculation about who else could have, might have or maybe have murdered Jodi Jones.

The fact is that these people have not been charged and convicted. Luke Mitchell has and it is totally outrageous to blame the victims family of murder or covering a murder up, or the multitude of other things that have been said about this family. They have suffered enough.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
the McCanns have been accused of exactly the same thing on this forum i don't see you jumping up in outrage about it.

what makes this family so different.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2011, 09:07:PM by nugnug »

Janet

  • Guest
the McCanns have been accused of exactly the same thing on this forum i don't see you jumping up in outrage about it.

why makes this family so different.

The McCanns case is nothing like this one.

The McCann's are pretty adept at defending themselves in a coherent and sensible manner.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
read the beginning of the thread it wasn't me who started all the personal stuff

I'm the one asked to justify every opinion i hold on the case.

and your the one who keeps saying facts you dont like are outrageous

the "facts" as you call the claims about members of the Jones family and others for that matter are not facts at all. That is what I find outrageous. All there is, is total speculation about who else could have, might have or maybe have murdered Jodi Jones.

The fact is that these people have not been charged and convicted. Luke Mitchell has and it is totally outrageous to blame the victims family of murder or covering a murder up, or the multitude of other things that have been said about this family. They have suffered enough.

half the stuff being said about the family was already mentioned in the trial so sorry it is fact.

yes there is a lot of speculation thats what happens on public forums.

just like its happening with the bamber case.

John

  • Guest
The sad fact is that Mitchell will never be cleared of this horrendous crime and the only way he has any hope is to blame someone else.  Problem is that everyone else has an alibi while poor old Lukey doesn't.

I will also hazard a guess and say that the SCCRC will not make a referral in this case following the refusal in his Cadder Appeal so looks like another 13 years for boyo!