Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 727261 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

John

  • Guest
All good things come to them who wait....

That said nugget I don't have an issue with you personally and have found you to be quite accommodating any time that we have cross posted.  However, you have made some serious accusations recently against people in Edinburgh which I hope you will never have to substantiate in a court of law.


Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16166
I see the auld Scottish blood feud is still simmering away   ;D

John

  • Guest
I notice it is now being said that John Ferris fingered Luke for the murder after all.  Could it be that Ferris and his friend Gordon Dickie did actually see something when they made over the wall that afternoon?  Could it be that they saw Luke Mitchell murdering Jodi Jones but were too traumatised to tell anyone except possibly David Dickie.  Is that why David Dickie was so sure that Luke was the culprit?

Lots beginning to add up now!

See page 12 of the discussion - post by Cheekio at 8.26pm 11 May



John Ferris pictured arriving at court
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 03:18:AM by John »

John

  • Guest
It seems that the nutty penguin has done a runner....    ;)

Anyway, apparently WAP are trying to get out of this one now that pussy is out of the bag.  Now we know why John Ferris did a bunk to Ayr with his maw and all....extremely interesting!  ;D




Murderer Luke Mitchell and new girlfriend attend Jodi's grave in the full glare of the Press and the police after having been told to stay away by the murdered girls family.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 03:48:PM by John »

John

  • Guest
The log burner situated in the Mitchell's back garden where the prosecution contend that Luke's clothing was burned on the afternoon of the murder.  Several of Corinne Mitchell's neighbours spoke of an unusual wafting smell emanating from the Mitchell garden.

« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 06:56:PM by John »

John

  • Guest
Lord Nimmo Smith said Jodi’s injuries were the worst he had ever seen.

A blade was drawn backwards and forwards across her throat at least 20 times.  Her eyelids were slit by a hand steady enough not to touch her eyeballs. And her clothes were cut from her body before deep gashes were made to a cheek, breast and her abdomen.  The knife was also jabbed hard into her mouth.

Jodi’s arms were then bound with her trousers and her naked body dumped behind a tree near a woodland path.  Within minutes of murdering his girlfriend in June 2003, Mitchell phoned her home to ask where she was.

Article




Victim... Jodi Jones' throat was cut 20 times
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 07:35:PM by John »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16850
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
It seems that the nutty penguin has done a runner....    ;)

Anyway, apparently WAP are trying to get out of this one now that pussy is out of the bag.  Now we know why John Ferris did a bunk to Ayr with his maw and all....extremely interesting!  ;D




Murderer Luke Mitchell and new girlfriend attend Jodi's grave in the full glare of the Press and the police after having been told to stay away by the murdered girls family.

i havent done runner john.

just sometime i other things to do than post on forums.


agian there is no proof she was girlfriend.

she was girl who happened

she happened to be a friend of jodi and wanted to pay respects

as did luke mitchell.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16850
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
The log burner situated in the Mitchell's back garden where the prosecution contend that Luke's clothing was burned on the afternoon of the murder.  Several of Corinne Mitchell's neighbours spoke of an unusual wafting smell emanating from the Mitchell garden.



the plce took that log burner to bits and found nothing had been burnt in it that shouldent have been they found no evedence that be used agianst luke mitchell at all.

John

  • Guest
The Infamous Mitchell Log burner...

Apparently the Appeal Court and the jury took a different view...

[139]...At page 17, the suspect had, following a barrage of questions to which the questioner had not awaited any answer, conceded that his mother and brother had had a fire on the night of 30 June 2003 in the log burner in the back garden of the house where the suspect lived.

[144] The first passage that had been founded upon by the Crown was to be found at page 17 of the transcript of the interview, where the appellant agreed that on 30 June 2003 his mother and brother had had a fire in the log burner. However, there had been evidence of that fire from Mr and Mrs Frankland and also from Mr Ramage.

[154] In these circumstances, it is necessary to consider the position in relation to those particular parts of the appellant's replies to questioning that the Crown founded upon during the course of the trial, with a view to seeing whether those individual replies were given to questions which ought to be regarded individually as unfair. The first of these replies is that at page 17 of the transcript concerning the fire at the log burner in the back garden on 30 June 2003. The appellant agreed that his mother and brother had had a fire. Looking at the questioning to which that reply was given, no unfairness strikes us as being involved. Furthermore, evidence of the existence of such a fire had been laid before the jury from Mr and Mrs Frankland and Mr Ramage.

Appeal Judgement 16 May 2008
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 04:46:PM by John »

Janet

  • Guest
This statement intrigues me.

Quote
The court heard that Luke Mitchell gave a statement to police on July 4, 2003, claiming he had had dinner with his mother, but not his brother, before leaving to meet Jodi that evening. He has previously told police he was at home until 5.30pm or 5.40pm.

Yet Shane has a different take on things.

Luke's brother admits mum aided evidence
Source: Evening News - Scotland
Date: 1/13/2005

THE brother of Jodi Jones murder accused Luke Mitchell today admitted discussing his police statement with his mother before telling police Luke was in the family's house on the day the schoolgirl was killed.

In a statement given to police on July 7, 2003, Shane Mitchell said he recalled seeing his brother in the kitchen "mashing tatties".

The High Court in Edinburgh heard that his mother had given a statement the previous day also claiming that Luke was in the kitchen that evening "cooking pies and mashing potatoes". But the jury previously heard that when Shane was questioned by police on April 14 last year he said he had not seen Luke in the house on the evening of June 30, 2003, and that he had been looking at pornography on his computer in his bedroom.

Advocate depute Alan Turnbull, QC, prosecuting, read sections of Shane's statement from July 7 to the jury. In his statement he told police that he remembered his mother's car being in the driveway and the front door being open.

His statement continued: "I went into the hallway and shouted out and then went upstairs to the bathroom to wash my hands. About five minutes later I came straight back down. When I was in the bathroom I left the door open.

"Afterwards I went downstairs into the living-room, then into the kitchen. Luke was standing at the cooker mashing tatties. I could smell burnt steak pies. I did not mention the smell because I did not want to insult him.

"He was pretty happy. I spoke to him, then my mother. That was the first time I had seen my mother that day and I was talking to her about how her day had been." The court heard that Shane then went upstairs to log on to his computer but was called down for dinner by Luke five minutes later.

Mr Turnbull asked Mr Mitchell: "I want to understand how it came to be that you make this reference to police about mashing tatties." Mr Turnbull then read out to the court the section of Mrs Mitchell's statement given on the previous day to Shane's. She said in her statement: "When I got home Luke was in the kitchen first of all. Luke then strained the potatoes and mashed them. At that point I think Shane came in and I could smell the pies in the oven and I asked one of them to take them out, commenting that Luke had overdone them."

Mr Turnbull then asked Mr Mitchell: "When you came to give your statement the very next day it includes reference to you saying that Luke was mashing the tatties and there being a burning smell."

Mr Mitchell agreed. Mr Turnbull then asked: "How can it be you gave information to police which was incorrect and then give information about mashing tatties and burnt pies.

"Before you gave that statement did you discuss with anyone what you should say to police?"

Mr Mitchell replied: "In a way."

Mr Turnbull said: "Who".

Mitchell replied: "My mother."

Mr Mitchell then admitted he had been affected by this discussion with his mother. "If it had not been for that discussion with your mother would you have been able to give any of this evidence to police?" Mr Turnbull asked.

"Not really," replied Mr Mitchell.

Asked what his mother had said to him after giving her statement Mr Mitchell replied: "She said to me: 'You came in and Luke was with us and we had tatties for dinner, then you went back out again.'"

Mr Mitchell told the court that he was "extremely shaken" when he gave his statement to police.

Luke Mitchell denies murdering Jodi on June 30, 2003 at a wooded area near Roan's Dyke, between the Newbattle and Easthouses areas of Dalkeith. The trial continues








John

  • Guest
An excellent post Janet which clearly shows that the Mitchell family lied through their teeth prior to and during the trial.  It is a sheer impossibility that two boys could be in a small house together for over half an hour with one of them making dinner and not hear each other.  Corinne Mitchell bleats on about Luke being in the garden when Shane came in and that is why they did not see each other.  That is quite possible but it is impossible for Luke to have prepared dinner including burning the chicken pie and Shane not noticing it especially when he was involved in an activity upstairs which he admitted he would only have done had the house been empty.

Add to this the fact that not one child ever came forward to say that they had seen Luke go home from school that afternoon, saw him go to his house around 4.40pm or saw him leave home at 5.30pm.  What is ever worse is that I offered to provide a reward for any witness who would come forward and give Luke Mitchell that crucial alibi and I was shot down in flames. 

It would appear that the Mitchell family would rather their son spend the next 13 years in prison than go searching for witnesses...to me that speaks volumes!

Telephone Hotline   still available for any witnesses  07092 984231

Did you see Luke Mitchell between 4.00pm and 5.40pm on the day of Jodi's murder?



http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-12877258.html
« Last Edit: May 16, 2011, 02:59:AM by John »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16850
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
its irrelevant weather anyone saw him go home because Jodi was still alive then.


John

  • Guest
Really?  Was she?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16850
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
the family story confirm she was still alive now unless the Jones and the Mitchell's were in it together she must of still been alive.