Author Topic: coul luke have showered and changed.  (Read 473 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
coul luke have showered and changed.
« on: February 23, 2022, 06:09:PM »
how an you have a shower and stillhave dirty mated hair a irty fingernails afterwoods.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2022, 07:36:PM by nugnug »

Offline Germane

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: coul luke have showered and changed.
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2022, 07:12:PM »
It’s very possible he did shower in his house after an initial clean-up at the small rivers in the woodland behind the gate he was spotted at acting suspiciously by LF & RW at approx 1740 hrs. Some people on this forum find the notion of LM cleaning at a small river to be ridiculous. Why? LM was the Davie Crocket type and loved outdoor activites such as cadets, camping, hunting, knives, fishing, motorcycles and horse-riding, and plus he was forensically aware  (said the police tried to get him back over that V gap so his dna would be there and he knew that they didn’t have his dna as it was only a partial profile). This lad was an adult in everything but age; was well mature beyond his years and his mum let him do as he pleased (smoking cannabis and drinking alcohol in the house and allowed to have girls stay overnight and have underage sex) and she indulged him and was used to getting his own way (CM even bought him another knife from a catalogue in dec ‘03). LM didn’t like to be told no (and I’ve a strong hunch that not liking not getting his own way resulted in that poor girl being brutally murdered in that coppice behind the wall at Roan’s dyke path after she confronted him).

As for LM being able to get his hair, hands & nails dirty again after showering . . . are you being serious? LM met up with 3 other lads at the abbey at 1930 hrs and was escorted to Dalkeith police station just after 12 midnight on 01.07.03. That’s almost 5 hours to get dirty again. During those 5 hours, he was mucking around woodland on a dull, wet and overcast night, smoking joints, playing football, playing on a tarzan swing near his house and basically boys were being boys. Was easily able to get dirty again. LM phoned and used David High specifically and purposely to bolster his alibi and so he could get dirty again (but, in court, these boys testified that he looked cleaner than normal when he first met them at 1930). LM was intelligent, devious, manipulative and calculating, evidently able to think quickly on his feet.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16846
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: coul luke have showered and changed.
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2022, 12:28:PM »
all witnessaounts say hes hair was irtythat night thats wy asking thequstion how o hae a wash and manage to stay dirty it would require some effort on your part i would think..

Offline Germane

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: coul luke have showered and changed.
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2022, 03:33:PM »
all witnessaounts say hes hair was irtythat night thats wy asking thequstion how o hae a wash and manage to stay dirty it would require some effort on your part i would think..

It’s certainly interesting. Probably didn’t wash his hair as he would be aware of how suspicious that would be, particularly as he had longish hair. It would be noticeable if shoulder-length hair had just been washed and plus the smell of shampoo would give that away. I suspect LM maybe rinsed it with water only. LM was devious, advanced for his age, calculating and forensically aware. He knew how to avoid detection and cover his tracks, so to speak.

Offline Fairplay1

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: coul luke have showered and changed.
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2022, 08:19:PM »
Well according to  the Police own examiner they made note of how dirty he was, rings of dirt round his neck , nails and hair all notably "dirty" as the examiner stated. I find it interesting how some will disregard evidence as it does not match their views.  Another area to be noted is the lack of any scratches, marks of any kind that he had been in any confrontation, as noted by the Medical examiner Jodi fought back which is supported by the Medical examiner note of defence wounds found in Appeal Documents and also on Frontline Scotland Documentary 2007, again this does not suit some peoples bias views therefore they rather bypass these areas that give logical doubt.  This as well as their being  no incriminating forensic transfer either on Luke , body and nails etc or his home ie drain pipes, door handles etc his house was search and examined not once but 3 times yet not one piece of incriminating evidence to say he had either Murdered Jodi or cleaned up after a murder.  Its rather astonishing how people have this 14 year old as some sort of Criminal Mastermind with magical powers to make all the evidence of himself disappear and some how leave unaccounted dna profiles on Jodi , some guy at the tender age of 14 🤔