Author Topic: Newspaper Articles.  (Read 1366 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 19922
Newspaper Articles.
« on: April 01, 2014, 07:45:PM »
Julie Mugfords Sensationalist Article in the News of the World
« Last Edit: July 29, 2014, 05:44:PM by Alias »
100% GUILTY - No doubts!

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12964
Re: Newspaper Articles.
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2014, 07:49:PM »
Julie Mugfords Sensationalist Article in the News of the World
Beyond belief imo.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 19922
Re: Newspaper Articles.
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2014, 12:23:PM »
The NOTW alleges that they were approached with compromising pictures of Sheila but didn't print them. Find that hard to believe given that at the outcome of the tragic events, they tried to sex-up the story with shots of Mugford that are completely unrelated to the case. Shows what scruples 'they' had. If they had gotten their hands on such pictures of Sheila, especially given that she was considered to have killed the family at the time - I have no doubt in my mind that they would have printed them! Or at the very LEAST would have made sure they had proof of the handover catching Jeremy/Brett banged to rights. However - there's nothing!!
100% GUILTY - No doubts!

Offline Alias

  • Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?

Grahame

  • Guest
Re: Newspaper Articles.
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2014, 12:05:PM »
Every time I see that article and Muggy's picture I think to myself, "Yes you made that deal before the court case you liar. Why didn't the jury see through her?

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Newspaper Articles.
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2014, 12:13:PM »
Every time I see that article and Muggy's picture I think to myself, "Yes you made that deal before the court case you liar. Why didn't the jury see through her?

The jury weren't aware either way, it was never questioned until the 2002 appeal which didn't have a jury.

Why don't you know this?  :-\

Grahame

  • Guest
Re: Newspaper Articles.
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2014, 01:41:PM »
The jury weren't aware either way, it was never questioned until the 2002 appeal which didn't have a jury.

Why don't you know this?  :-\
Because I'm iggrant.