http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6697.msg305204.html#msg305204Anyway. Here is the thread.
It seems in 2015 David believed -
There was a mountain of evidence against Bamber.
Bamber's only chance was to prove there was an industrial frame.
If there is no conspiracy 'you can safely believe Bamber is guilty'.
David is saying the police, experts & relatives would not leave forged documents lying around. So unethical methods of detection are required.
Supporters have 'not completed step 1'.
------------------
Again I agree with David on the above.
However I don't agree him deciding it was possible to fabricate one piece of evidence was a strong enough reason to change stance. This is a non evidence reason as there is no proof the silencer was fabricated.