The point I am trying to make is why try and influence folk regarding the possible membership of an organisation which has no bearing on the case in point. If this man was indeed a freemason then what evidence do you have that it has any bearing on this case at all? Im not sure what you mean by the 69 as my alias has 30!!
I guess what im trying to say is that I won't let you influence people based on some prejudicial viewpoint you have over an institution you obviously know nothing about.
I think I owe people an explanation as to why I posted this thread and asked this question regarding Robert Boutflour?
I did so because it has been taken for granted that he was a Freemason and that this somehow influenced people in high places, who were also Freemasons to appoint someone else in place of Taff Jones to take over the investigation of the WHF murders?
This together with the denial of vidvic in another post that RWB was NOT a Freemason. All I wanted to establish was, was he a Freemason or was he not and it his was, then could it be established with documentary proof.