Thought I'd just chip in. I totally agree with Nikos on the two wounds to SC. the second,fatal wound bears no relevance IMO. How was the first administered? We've see the trajectory drawing. I can draw my own conclusion from that.as for Police corruption there is proof (that golden word) of police withholding evidence so there was an element of corruption,on what scale and if it made any difference I don't know. The twisting of interpretation of evidence presented as fact of late bemuses me. Mikes picture,first of the neck wound,(can't get it of the hard drive) which then becomes a photo showing tampon inserted,has now become tampon missing.... All I can say is I was a defiantly innocent.now I'm probably guilty. Please,please though,PROVE to me that I'm wrong.i am listening