0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't want to drag you off topic on this important thread but unless I have picked things up incorrectly, your original introduction scenario for the informant was related to him having read this forum, yet now he goes back to 2008. Like I say, I may have picked it up wrong?
yes, a misunderstanding, since I was first contacted in 2008, but informant did not start opening up until he read material on the original "Jeremy Bamber.com, site (of which I indirectly had some input), and this forum...
Ask yourselves why did police destroy the photograph which DS Jones took of the phone in the kitchen (SBJ/2)?
You need to get rid of any references to exhibits seized, found or taken, which bear any mention of exhibit references, SBJ/2, 3, and 4, otherwise, it becomes more difficult to brainwash everybody into believing or accepting that the silencer (SBJ/1) found by DS `Stan' Jones, was the silencer found by David Boutflour (DRB/1)? Take out the other SBJ references, and it becomes much easier to carry off the silencer conspiracy, where two different silencers became merged into one...
If you are DS 'Stan' Jones, and you have been ordered to eradicate references to the silencer he took possession of, not only is it necessary to destroyed the exhibits linked to it, but you might have to start tampering with your pocketbook entries...
Just finished reading this , a fascinating read , MT do you know , why he became interested ?