JEREMY BAMBER CASE > Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion

BREAKING NEWS - SECRET BLOOD TESTS ON GUNS TRIGGER GUARD FOR BLOOD DEPOSITS !!!

(1/6) > >>

mike tesko:
AFTER YEARS OF PAINSTAKING RESEARCH, EVIDENCE HAS BEEN DISCOVERED THAT THE EXISTSENCE 0F PREVIOUSLY UNDISCLOSED FORENSIC/PHOTOGRAPHIC/BLOOD GROUP/ DNA (APPLICABLE AFTER THE DATE OF ARREST/CONVICTION AND SENTENCE) EVIDENCE THAT ESTABLISHES WHO FIRED THE .22 ANSHUZT RIFLE DURING THE SHOOTING INCIDENTS, BACKED UP BY PHOTOGRAPHIC (POLICE) EVIDENCE WHICH WAS CONCEALED FROM THE JURY/COURT AT THE TIME OF JEREMY BAMBERS OCTOBER, 1986 CHELMSFORD CROWN COURT TRIAL ...

mike tesko:
LINK THAT/THIS TO THE FOLLOWING:-

mike tesko:
How astonishing that one of the relatives (David Boutflour, in particular, refers to a trigger guard mark which he claims he saw on Jeremys index finger at the time  of the shootings, or very shortly thereafter?

Jeremy Bamber has cuts on his hands, and he suggests to the police that they submit the rifle to forensics to have the weapons trigger guard for blood!

mike tesko:
How odd that there has never yet been any disclosure regarding this important matter?

The main focus of this particular thread rests upon and with/to the fact that anyone who handled that rifle during any part of the shooting incident, would probably had got cuts to their hands/ fingers - such marks which could have been made by (for example) the shooters index finger, getting a cut (s) from it coming into contact with the trigger guard of the gun, whilst tyhey were shooting victims dead!

Quite extraordinarily, it (that/this) favours Bamber that on the morning when the police commenced their investigation into these shootings, the police officer who was taking Jeremy Bambers first witness statement (7th August 1985), paid particular interest to Bambers hands and fingers, and confirms that at that stage Jeremy Bambers hands / fingers were uninjured and cut free...

mike tesko:

--- Quote from: mike tesko on January 16, 2021, 08:08:AM ---

Quite extraordinarily, it (that/this) favours Bamber that on the morning when the police commenced their investigation into these shootings, the police officer who was taking Jeremy Bambers first witness statement (7th August 1985), paid particular interest to Bambers hands and fingers, and confirms that at that stage Jeremy Bambers hands / fingers were uninjured and cut free...

--- End quote ---

By the time the case came to trial (October, 1986), the prosecution/police were deceiving the jury to the effect that Sheila Caffells hands /fingers were spotlessly clean of blood, and uninjured..

With this in mind, all photographs taken at the scene by one police officer or another which showed a view of Sheila's right hand/fingers remained undisclosed to those representing Jeremy Bambers interests..

There was no bloodstaining, or marks on any part of her hands/fingers which could/ would give 'a very strong clue' as to the identity of the shooter of the gun (rifle) during this shooting tragedy..

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version