I have just been tidying up the piles and piles of case papers about the investigation. I started to read a letter that Jeremy had written to me in his own handwriting. The letter consisted of 4 pages, and is dated, 4th May 2011, in which he is referring to existence and proof that a police officer, who finally agrees with me after telling in some 18 years or more ago, that DS Jones returned to the crime scene on the first morning of the police investigation, from Jeremy's cottage where Jones and DC Clark had been to take a witness statement from Jeremy. I had already seen documentary proof by reference to a handwritten crime scene log that a police officer was stood in the vicinity of the entrance to the farmhouse, making a log of everyone who entered and left the farmhouse. It clearly states in that crime scene log, that DS Jones returned to the farmhouse until about 12.30pm...
Jones went back to the crime scene and spent one hour and 20 minutes collecting and seizing items of evidential value. The items of evidence were a silencer, a calendar, and a rifle, which he photographed in situ in a downstairs toilet. Now, I don't have to unnecessarily keep repeating myself, but Jones took possession of four items from the scene on that occasion (SBJ/1, SBJ/2, SBJ/3, and SBJ/4). Well, Jeremy's letter that he sent to me, he is mentioning press conferences, where ACC Peter Simpson, is recorded on video him saying that a policeman found a silencer st the scene shortly after arriving there on the first morning of the investigation, this happened on 7th August 1985, and this was mentioned on several different times until 20th September 1985, which coincides with what I have been saying all along. Apparently, Jeremy says journalist friends of his have got footage from archives confirming that the police did find a silencer with blood on the end of its barrel which DS Jones collected and took it away. So, I was right all along, there must have been silencers recovered from the scene, an cops relatives, and the Lab, have merged the results of the examination of one or other, and settling for putting all the eggs in one basket, that's where exhibit reference 'DRB/1' came into play, because a lab's record exists confirming that exhibit 'DRB/1' did not get sent to the Lab' to be examined until the 20th September 1985, therefore, any bloodgroup evidence obtained from blood found in a different silencer and tested at the lab', on 12th, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985, could not have been extracted and tested, or be linked or associated with silencer 'DRB/1'. Similarly, lab item documents which were carried out on 13th August 1985, has got a written note upon it, which states that flecks of red paint were present in the silencers end cap when the silencer was returned to the Lab'
Er...
What?
How on earth could 13th August 1985 have been, or be the second time it had been brought or sent to the lab' to be examined? Since the second time a silencer was taken or submitted to the lab' was on the 30th August 1985, and the reason why a silencer was submitted on this date, was because that silencer had been the same silencer found in a gun cupboard at the scene by David Boutflour on 10th August 1985, and fingerprinted by Cook using the cynoachrylate fuming system (superglue), it must have been the 'SBJ/1" silencer that Cook had taken to the lab's on 13th August 1985, which he had fingerprinted on 15th August 1985. Between 13th August 1985 and 20th September 1985, silencer had not been brought or sent to be examined at the Lab' because 'DRB/1', (David Robert Boutflour) did not recover the 2and of his silencer finds until 11th of September 1985. Therefore, there had to have been three separate looking parkerhale silencers in the possession of zessex police, and at the lab's, because silencer 'DB/1' could not have been the same silencer as the one ('SBJ/1'), because reference to crushed red particles of paint in the knurled pattern around the circumference of its metal end cap, could not have been the second occasion, the silencer that DS Jones took from the scene on 7th August 1985. Proof that this was/is true is because no general examination lab' form was ever in existence, or at least none was disclosed - the only two general examination records produced were the ones dated 13th August 1985 ('DB/1'), and 20th September 1985 'DRB/1'). What appears to have occurred is that those involved, wanted people to believe that there was only ever one silencer, when in actual fact there three!
Hence why, no general examination Lab document disclosed, it was because if anyone stumbled upon what was being done it would be a lot easier to merge two silencers into the same one rather than with three..
That's why no general examination form was ever disclosed for the submission of the middle silencer (30th August 1985) altering the exhibit references between two general examination forms was a lot easier and far less complicated, exhibit reference 'SBJ/1' (13th August 1985 - submission to the lab's was simply altered into exhibit reference 'DB/1', as though silencer 'DB/1' had been the very same silencer that got taken to the lab's by Cook, on that date..
With regard to the submission of silencer 'DRB/1' to the lab's on the 20th September 1985, the exhibit reference ('DB/1') which had been added o to the 13th August 1985 examination form, was simply altered again from 'DB/1', into DRB/1 to try and fool everyone not in the know, to believe there was only one silencer, wherever at any one time with the incriminating blood group evidence and red paint particle evidence from the red painted aga in the kitchen. But that can't possibly be true, because of the fact that David Boutflour took responsibility for finding or seizing two silencers from the same gun cupboard, one month a part (10th August 1985 and 11th September 1985) he even mentions in one of his statements that found one of the two silencers in a box in the gun cupboard, claiming that the second silencer he found was in a different position. Documentary evidence exists to prove this, but when DC Oakey took David Boutflours message on 13th September 1985, he wrote down that 'he didn't...
I know why the officer made that comment,its because that very same officer was present at the scene on the morning when DS Jones took possession of 'SBJ/1' on 7th August 1985, and that there was only blood on the end of one silencer in the beginning, and DC Oakey knew that silencers 'SBJ'1, and 'DRB/1 could not possibly have been the same silencers, because he found out that only one of them had got 17 internalised baffle plates, whilst the other only had got 14...
