Author Topic: Query re forum members  (Read 769 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44256
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2020, 10:00:PM »
It's always worth another point of view.

Offline Robittybob1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2020, 10:52:PM »
Isn't this what JB was more or less claiming?  For some reason Julie pointed the finger at MM but maybe even they didn't know. 
MM is said to have a solid alibi so obviously they picked the wrong person.

Is there anyone else who thinks there was a third person?

Offline Hartley.

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2020, 10:57:PM »
Thank you for your view. I'm not sure what those members themselves think, however I would be tempted to place them in the 50%-60% guilt band. I don't have a dead on 50% option, so the only other option for neutrality would be 40%-50%.  Not sure where I'm supposed to put QC either.

I think QC fluctuates to be the opposite of whomever he happens to be talking to at any given moment.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8958
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #33 on: September 22, 2020, 11:11:PM »
Isn't this what JB was more or less claiming?  For reason Julie pointed the finger at MM but maybe even they didn't know. 
MM is said to have a solid alibi so obviously they picked the wrong person.

Is there anyone else who thinks there was a third person?

If you believe Jeremy received a call from Nevil implicating Sheila, the chance of a third party is practically nil.

Offline Hartley.

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2020, 11:19:PM »
If you believe Jeremy received a call from Nevil implicating Sheila, the chance of a third party is practically nil.

I'm not sure he believes there was a call, just asked if there was evidence of such a call.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8958
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #35 on: September 22, 2020, 11:22:PM »
I'm not sure he believes there was a call, just asked if there was evidence of such a call.

He believes this -

I think someone else did it.  Not JB or SC but a third party tidied up after SC started the massacre.


Offline Hartley.

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #36 on: September 22, 2020, 11:27:PM »
He believes this -

Well why not? We've obviously spent a long time looking at the details of the case and could dismiss such a notion, perhaps he is still learning about the case and throwing out ideas.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8958
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #37 on: September 22, 2020, 11:47:PM »
Well why not? We've obviously spent a long time looking at the details of the case and could dismiss such a notion, perhaps he is still learning about the case and throwing out ideas.

I’m simply pointing out that if “SC started the massacre“ as Robbitybob put it. A third party is not plausible. Agree?

Offline Hartley.

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #38 on: September 23, 2020, 12:27:AM »
I’m simply pointing out that if “SC started the massacre“ as Robbitybob put it. A third party is not plausible. Agree?

Oh David, I'm pretty sure you you could use your imagination
and come up with a scenario that it was.
But yes I agree.

Offline Robittybob1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #39 on: September 23, 2020, 12:51:AM »
If you believe Jeremy received a call from Nevil implicating Sheila, the chance of a third party is practically nil.
The call could have come before the shooting got going.

Offline Robittybob1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #40 on: September 23, 2020, 12:53:AM »
I'm not sure he believes there was a call, just asked if there was evidence of such a call.
I believe there was a call.  IMO Jeremy felt it would be fatal for him if he went around there without police support.  He says much the same in one of is statements.

Offline Robittybob1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #41 on: September 23, 2020, 12:56:AM »
I’m simply pointing out that if “SC started the massacre“ as Robbitybob put it. A third party is not plausible. Agree?
Well only if you don't see the whole situation. 

Offline Hartley.

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #42 on: September 23, 2020, 01:13:AM »
I believe there was a call.  IMO Jeremy felt it would be fatal for him if he went around there without police support.  He says much the same in one of is statements.

I guess it comes down to whether you believe  his version of events.

Offline Robittybob1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #43 on: September 23, 2020, 03:29:AM »
I guess it comes down to whether you believe  his version of events.

Well I will be looking for evidence that supports Jeremy's version.  But it is such a big case and very scattered information, I don't think I can afford to make it a fulltime mission.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 22278
Re: Query re forum members
« Reply #44 on: September 23, 2020, 07:10:AM »
I guess it comes down to whether you believe  his version of events.

Best to follow the evidence. There is no evidence Sheila committed the massacre. Therefore it was Bamber,  unless as Lookout says there was an industrial frame.

A fully fit Nevill would have instantly taken the rifle back. Whether Sheila was acting aggressively or passively with it.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.