0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
65
I'm not too surprised by that Hartley as your posts latterly , to me anyway, hinted at uncertainty as opposed to your posts initially. You can sense a change in some posters who were regulars.
Yes I’ve gone down Lookout to 99% 😂😂😂😂. Only joking my friend 👍. If NGB keeps posting I might slide down a bit more 🙈🙈
Why the change? I am genuinely interested.
Not really changed in terms guilt, just soundness of conviction, mostly concerning JM's evidence and how it was obtained.
There are quite a few forum members, whose posting period didn't really coincide much with mine - or- I may not have had much involvement with them. Can anyone please help me understand.. at roughly what percentage of guilt, the following members perceived JB? NotSureOnceSaidSherlock
I'm afraid this doesn't move you on my scale. As it is a scale of guilt. I'm not aware of any recent developments regarding JM's evidence or how it was obtained. I did see something in The Guardian a few years back.
Smythe, to my mind is more neutral between the two of them.
Here's one for you all. Of the current posters Robittybob1 and Smythe, which one is the more neutral in their stance? Is it a case that you couldn't get a cigarette paper between their neutrality.. Or is one less neutral than the other?
I think someone else did it. Not JB or SC but a third party tidied up after SC started the massacre.
lol