You are nasty. Your threads have sometimes been entertaining and I'd be reluctant to see you go, but the way you are proceeding this may be inevitable. Show some common courtesy and a little humility if at all possible for new and longstanding members alike.
I am not nasty at all. I am extremely nice and civil to people who are nice and civil to me.
I am just being nasty to you and Hartley, because you yourselves are nasty, abusive, dishonest liars. You deserve it because you are nasty. That's my approach to things,. Steve.
To me, two wrongs
do make a right.
Want to be nasty to me? Then I'll be nasty back.
I actually find your hypocrisy and gall breath-taking, Steve.
I also perceive a threat in what you say. If the moderators have an issue with me, then let them speak now and if they want me gone, I'll definitely go.
Fine. I'll leave you all to Steve and Hartley's monkey grunts.
Free speech is for monkeys and Steve and Hartley prove it.
Again, Steve, because you have a second-class mind, you fail to appreciate these distinctions. You are blind to your own behaviour.
I may not be educated, but I am far more nimble than you, Steve.
For those who doubt the above, I'll just leave you with an assessment of Steve from back in 2012 by a "Martin". I find it particularly apt.
Your agenda and purpose here is clear, Steve. You're not fooling me. Martin nails it.
Steve_uk is on this forum to do a job. The obvious intention behind this stupid post is to distract attention from the matter under consideration, namely, the fact that Anthony Pargeter’s statement appears to support Jeremy’s claim that the silencer was handed back to the relatives before David Boutflour allegedly found it.
From a statement by Anthony Pargeter.
“Sometime after the 10 August 1985, I received a telephone call from David Boutflour who is a cousin of mine. He told me the silencer had been returned to the family, presumably by the police. He said there was a large scratch on it, some red paint on the knurled end and what appeared to be blood. I advised David to return it to the police straight away.”
Bamber’s allegations.
1 That police officers returned the sound moderator to members of his family, where with police knowledge it was tampered with and then returned to the police, where evidence was found. (statement pages 2 - 5)
2 That collusion took place between police officers and witnesses to put paint on the silencer. (statement page 9)
…...
7 That collusion took place between police officers and David Boutflour in making a statement which contains false evidence.