What a strange world we live in.
It is indeed a strange world when somebody can post thousands of times to this forum over years and years under multiple identities and yet he doesn't even know basic facts about the case. But then, bias does call brain damage.
What people like you don't understand Hartley, because you're thick, is that you're harming your own case. If it wasn't for people like you and Steve, I'd probably just think, 'Oh, Jeremy is guilty, it's simple'. But as soon as people dare to think or ask questions, people like you come on here trying to stir up trouble and that makes me question why you're doing that. Are you hiding something? It's just a natural question to ask.
It's ironic that pro-guilt people in this case have got themselves so wound up with it all, that they defeat their own cause.
Another irony of this is that I'm not even saying Jeremy is innocent. I'm not even in his camp. All I'm doing is asking questions. What's your issue with that Hartley?
If you and Steve had two brains cells to rub together, you'd just ignore people like me. Instead, you spend a large part of your time - in Steve's case, until recently, pretty much all his time - coming on here picking fights with people.
Jeremy Bamber runs your life, Hartley. Your life is based around Jeremy Bamber. That means Jeremy Bamber has won.
I find that really, really sad.