I think it's her statement of 8th. September 1985 that is the relevant one. She states that she was woken by a housemate, Douglas Dale, at roughly 3.15 a.m. That partly explains what happened, but I'm still suspicious. It just seems awfully convenient to be woken up in the early hours of the morning like that. Does that happen often?
The precise issue I have here is that this whole business of the phone calls is extremely time-sensitive. If you ring somebody at 3.15 a.m., or thereabouts, it's going to take a while for them to come to the phone, if they do so at all, and they'll be a whole fuss made by the person answering, this Mr Dale, about why you're calling at this hour and are you some sort of loony making a prank call, etc.?
It all seems a bit contrived to me. It's all highly suspect.
On the other hand, in Jeremy and Julie's defence, there is no reason Jeremy would lie about making such a call, since his alibi is with the police.
I know why people who are emotionally-attached to Julie Mugford don't like this line of speculation. I don't consider her evidence credible. Nor, it seems, did the judge - ironically, it was the disruptive poster above who pointed this out to us!
Yet it is possible she was more involved in this than she is letting on and that her whole story to the second police investigation may have been a smokescreen.