Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery  (Read 3657 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12639

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16851
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #16 on: May 04, 2020, 01:30:PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPzEgkCJrmA&feature=youtu.be&t=28

yes its brendan dasseys corcied confession thats allready been dealt with many times.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12639
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2020, 01:34:PM »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16851
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #18 on: May 04, 2020, 01:42:PM »
the full corced confession on there it has been posted before.

all 7 hours of it.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12639
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2020, 01:54:PM »
the full corced confession on there it has been posted before.

all 7 hours of it.

Its not a coerced confession. Once you finish all your English lessons with Bob The Train you can work it out all by yourself.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #20 on: May 04, 2020, 02:40:PM »
I don’t think Steven Avery sounds a very nice man but that is no excuse for what looks like plenty of misconduct by the police and that’s where I compare it with the Bamber case. The police got really nasty when they kept getting caught out. I watched the Amanda Knox documentary who was presumed guilty partly because of her behaviour after the murders. No evidence?
Sounds like the Bamber Scenario.

I would never trust the police after what you see on these documentaries
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16851
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #21 on: May 04, 2020, 03:13:PM »
I don’t think Steven Avery sounds a very nice man but that is no excuse for what looks like plenty of misconduct by the police and that’s where I compare it with the Bamber case. The police got really nasty when they kept getting caught out. I watched the Amanda Knox documentary who was presumed guilty partly because of her behaviour after the murders. No evidence?
Sounds like the Bamber Scenario.

I would never trust the police after what you see on these documentaries

if the that video is genuine id like to know how they were listning to conversations he had with his lawyer thats a serious crime.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12639
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2020, 06:26:PM »
I don’t think Steven Avery sounds a very nice man but that is no excuse for what looks like plenty of misconduct by the police and that’s where I compare it with the Bamber case. The police got really nasty when they kept getting caught out. I watched the Amanda Knox documentary who was presumed guilty partly because of her behaviour after the murders. No evidence?
Sounds like the Bamber Scenario.

I would never trust the police after what you see on these documentaries

Not only did he rape and kill Teresa Halbach, he was also raping his underage niece. They were going to prosecute him for this prior to to the Halbach murder. The idea that they would frame him for another crime when they were already going press charges makes no sense.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16851
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2020, 06:30:PM »
Not only did he rape and kill Teresa Halbach, he was also raping his underage niece. They were going to prosecute him for this prior to to the Halbach murder. The idea that they would frame him for another crime when they were already going press charges makes no sense.

his neice retracted those cliams as is well documented.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2020, 09:25:PM by nugnug »

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12639
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2020, 06:32:PM »
his retracted those cliams as is well documented.

You just made that up.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16851
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2020, 09:24:PM »
You just made that up.

well you can look it up or can post a link to the other thread were this was allready esablished.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12639
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #26 on: May 06, 2020, 10:39:AM »
well you can look it up or can post a link to the other thread were this was allready esablished.

No you cant. Because you made it up.

If the following witnesses have all recanted the following, the burden is on you to prove it. If its "well documented" as you claim then you should have no problem providing the relevant material.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16851
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #27 on: May 06, 2020, 03:33:PM »
here is the other can see what has been established here.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9730.msg476467.html#msg476467

and we will see who is making things up

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16851
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #28 on: May 06, 2020, 03:41:PM »
No you cant. Because you made it up.

If the following witnesses have all recanted the following, the burden is on you to prove it. If its "well documented" as you claim then you should have no problem providing the relevant material.



its no good faking documents to back up your argument the facts hae allready been established.

anyone canlook at thm.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 09:58:PM by nugnug »

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12639
Re: Jeremy Bamber v Steven Avery
« Reply #29 on: May 06, 2020, 07:00:PM »
its no faking documents to back up your argument the facts hae allready been established.

anyone canlook at thm.

People cannot look at something you just made up.