Author Topic: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy  (Read 314 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline Roch

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11509
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2020, 11:30:PM »

Offline Roch

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11509
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2020, 11:41:PM »
If there was nothing to hide in the documents that the CPS refute were not disclosed, then just disclose them again. For the sake of the cost incurred for a bit of retrieval and scanning by some admin staff, the authorities would rather pay a renouned QC and argue the case instead?
« Last Edit: May 30, 2020, 11:41:PM by Roch »

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8920
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2020, 12:17:AM »
"She added that the CCRC had previously “looked extremely extensively at the issue of whether or not there was a second sound moderator” and said Bamber was “tribunal shopping to avoid going back to the CCRC”."


Who can blame him?  :-\

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 22241
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2020, 03:57:AM »
'The senior investigating officer in the 1985 White House Farm ­murders destroyed evidence in his own home, a court heard.'

----------

How would anyone know Ainsley did this 35 years ago?



'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Roch

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11509
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2020, 08:28:AM »
'The senior investigating officer in the 1985 White House Farm ­murders destroyed evidence in his own home, a court heard.'

----------

How would anyone know Ainsley did this 35 years ago?

2010 is mentioned - which is puzzling, as I understand Ainsley retired after one of the appeals.

Offline JackieD

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2386
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2020, 10:38:AM »
2010 is mentioned - which is puzzling, as I understand Ainsley retired after one of the appeals.


I bet he did
From Colin Caffells
His relationship with Sheila was one of brotherly love. He was very proud of having a beautiful sister who was a photographic model

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44230
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2020, 01:37:PM »
Would " this evidence " have anything to do with the late " Taff " Jones's logs etc ?

Offline Roch

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11509
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2020, 02:18:PM »
Would " this evidence " have anything to do with the late " Taff " Jones's logs etc ?

I doubt it.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44230
Re: Claim re Ainsley taking evidence home to destroy
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2020, 03:10:PM »
I doubt it.




Where are all " Taff's " notes anyway ?