Well people sheltered in care homes weren't doing any harm, yet seem to have borne the brunt. Does it follow from this that the caregivers were slipshod in their personal hygiene habits and have unwittingly transmitted the virus to the most vulnerable section of society? My area has just entered Tier 4 and thank God it has, or hundreds of lager louts would be thronging the streets, the virus roaming rampant and increasing the pressure on the NHS, which might well have to cope with an influenza epidemic this winter alongside.
Don't I have the right to go about my business uninfected, just as you may have the right not to wear a face mask if you so choose?
No, you don't. A government, being a manmade authority, cannot shield you from submicroscopic infectious agents and bacteria that occur in Nature. Any effort to publicly mitigate your expose that involves infringing on my ordinary civil liberties - to perambulate around, not to have to wear face coverings unnecessarily, etc. - demands the most extraordinary justification. The lethality of SARS-COV 2 is a fraction of a percent, and fatalities almost-always occur only in those with co-morbidities or who are elderly, and even then this virus is often only a secondary factor in the fatality. I rest here on the government's own statistics. I don't need to indulge in conspiracy theories, the government's own figures make my case for me.
There is simply no justification for your demands that businesses should close, we should restrict our basic freedoms and wear face coverings, and submit to an untested vaccine - if that is what you are demanding. The various impositions and infringements grossly outweigh the risk and are the result of mass hysteria rather than any real biological or public health hazard.
I must ask: do either you or David actually have an argument or are you just resting here on what people in authority tell you?