Author Topic: New member  (Read 1008 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline stuart45

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
New member
« on: February 29, 2020, 01:57:PM »
Really interesting and well mannered forum. Old enough to remember the case, although only became interested after the TV prog. Wife is convinced he's guilty after watching it, but she would find anyone on trial for child murder guilty if there was half a chance he did it.
As my Daughter and Son in law work in TV she ought to know how easy it is for the media to turn people's minds.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
Re: New member
« Reply #1 on: February 29, 2020, 03:01:PM »
Interesting. Why does your wife believe Jeremy is guilty after the drama?  Confused????
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline stuart45

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: New member
« Reply #2 on: February 29, 2020, 03:39:PM »
I don't think the drama did him any favours. Everyone I know who saw it thinks he's guilty.
My wife can't believe a tiny little girl could batter a 6ft4in farmer and get the better of him, apart from not liking him(due to the way he was portrayed in it)
I would need to read a lot more about the case.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16117
Re: New member
« Reply #3 on: February 29, 2020, 03:45:PM »
I don't think the drama did him any favours. Everyone I know who saw it thinks he's guilty

Don't tell David1819 that.

Welcome to the forum BTW.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: New member
« Reply #4 on: February 29, 2020, 04:04:PM »
Considering the initial verdict given by " Taff " Jones of murder/suicide, I'd rather he'd have gone into the whys and wherefores of why as there's always an underlying reason why a person would commit suicide in the first place. A thorough investigation into suicide wouldn't have gone amiss.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: New member
« Reply #5 on: February 29, 2020, 04:33:PM »
" Taff's " conclusion would have come about because of seeing only one neck injury.

Offline chris28

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: New member
« Reply #6 on: February 29, 2020, 05:20:PM »
I thought the drama was very biased.the relatives came across very greedy and unkind.Jeremy must of felt very alone and frightened at 24 years of age.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 37668
Re: New member
« Reply #7 on: February 29, 2020, 06:31:PM »
I thought the drama was very biased.the relatives came across very greedy and unkind.Jeremy must of felt very alone and frightened at 24 years of age.

Why did the relatives come across as very greedy?

Ann Eaton said she wanted some of June's jewellery for sentimental reasons. Other than that it was the relatives keeping WHF clean & engaging with the police about their concerns.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17937
Re: New member
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2020, 06:17:PM »
Really interesting and well mannered forum. Old enough to remember the case, although only became interested after the TV prog. Wife is convinced he's guilty after watching it, but she would find anyone on trial for child murder guilty if there was half a chance he did it.
As my Daughter and Son in law work in TV she ought to know how easy it is for the media to turn people's minds.
Welcome Stuart 45 and give it time.