it was impossible to have been true!
Police and Lab' records confirm that three different marked 'sound moderators / silencers' ('SBJ/1', 'DB/1', and 'DRB/1' were submitted to Huntington Laboratory on three separate occasions, (13th August 1985, 30th August 1985, and the 20th September 1985) each submission different to the purpose of-seriously, neglectfully, and dishonestly, making out in a court of law, that there had only ever been just the one sound Moderator, when all along there had been and was three identical looking ones, handed around like a game of pass the parcel by 'relatives', 'police and 'lab' experts' to introduce what is almost certainly fabricated evidence!
Extracted from earlier post« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2020, 10:17:PM »[Nobody told or informed the jury or Jeremy Bambers counsel, either before, or during the commencement of the trial at Chelmsford Crown court on 2nd October 1986, that a police motorcycle outrider had been dispatched to collect two identical looking Parker hale silencers from the relatives and bring these to the courthouse! So there were three silencers, the one exhibited at the trial ('DRB/1'), and two others, in control of the other two ('SBJ/1' and 'DB/1'), held by the prosecution witnesses (the Eaton's and the Boutflours) when there was only supposed to have been involved the use of only one sound moderator / silencer, nothing could be any clearer...]The fact of the matter, was DS Jones recovered the first Sound Moderator (silencer) 'SBJ/1' from the scene on the very first morning of the ongoing police investigations (7th August 1985), after returning to the farmhouse from Jeremy's cottage, where he had originally been tasked along withe PC Myall to take a witness statement from Jeremy Bamber. However at 11.15am that same morning DS Jones went back to the farmhouse, where he took possession of four exhibits, namely, SBJ/4, SBJ/3, SBJ/2, and the first Sound Moderator SBJ/1. A police log that was being kept to record the names of everybody who went into and came out of the farmhouse once senior officers started performing 'INFORMATIVES' from about 9am, onward. When DS Jones was interviewed by COLP regarding his reason for returning to the scene after having already left it previously, Jones said that he couldn't remember why he had gone back to the scene, or what if anything he did when he arrived there (See interview of DS Jones by COLP Investigators!
The second Sound Moderator (silencer) 'DB/1' recovered from the farmhouse was found by David BOUTFLOUR on the 10th August 1985. This second silencer was subsequently handed over to DS Jones by Peter Eaton, on the evening of 12th August 1985.
A third Sound Moderator (silencer) 'DRB/1' - originally labelled 'AE/1', was handed over to DC Oakey (Headquarters SOCO team), on the 11th September 1985...
Now this is where it starts getting interesting because the third Sound Moderator (silencer) 'DRB/1' was not sent along to Huntingdon Laboratory to be scientifically examined until the 20th September 1985, and therefore it could not have been one or the other additional silencers (DB/1) that was sent off to the Lab' at Huntingdon, on either the 30th August 1985, and 'DRB/1' could not have been the silencer 'SBJ/1' which DI Cook had taken to the Lab' to be scientifically Examined by Glynis Howard on the 13th August 1985, because sound moderator (DRB/1) was not handed over to police by Ann Eaton on the 11th September 1985, a silencer which was kept by Essex police until after DS Davison and DS Eastwood (Headquarters SOCO team) had fingerprinted it on the 13th September 1985, retained it in their possession for another week or so, so by the time police eventually dispatched it off to the Lab' on the 20th September 1985, it did not get examined by Scientists, until at the very earliest, the 25th September 1985!
Similarly, The second Sound Moderator (silencer) 'DB/1' did not in fact get sent off to Huntingdon Laboratory to be scientifically examined until the 30th August 1985, and so it (SBJ/1) could not have been the first Sound Moderator (silencer), which DI Cook had taken along to the Lab' on the 13th August 1985, the three submissions of a sound moderator to Hungtingdon Lab' with a view to being scientifically examined or tested ('SBJ/1', 'DB/1', and 'DRB'1') were individual Sound moderators which were either sent or taken to the Lab' on 13th August 1985, 30th August 1985, and the 20th September 1985, accounted for why three different / separate Sound Moderators (silencers) were brought to court on the first day of the trial..
Two collected from the relatives by a police motorcycle outrider and brought at speed to the courthouse, and of course there was the third Sound Moderator (silencer) 'SBJ/1', Court exhibit 9, upon which, and inside of which had supposedly been found crushed red paint from the kitchen aga surround and mantelpiece, and blood attributed as belonging primarily to Sheila Caffell. Silencer 'DRB/1' wasn't even present at Huntingdon Lab' on the 14th September 1985, onwards until up to and including the 20th September 1985, when the blood was detected inside the other silencer (DB/1), as confirmed by Lab' documents. Red paint was not detected to be present in the knurl of the third of these sound moderators (DRB/1) until as late as 2nd October 1985 - so it becomes somewhat obvious that the red paint and the human blood attributed as being either unique to Sheila, or an intimate mixture of her parents bloods, could not have been associated with the same sound Moderator, because the third of these silencers (DRB/1) couldn't have been present at the lab' on any date prior to the 20th September 1985, when lo and behold, the blood was found inside one of the other sound moderators (that silencer being 'DB/1'). Additionally the silencer ('DRB/1) upon which the red paint eventually surfaced by 2nd October 1985, could not have been found on either of the two sound moderators ('DB/1' and or 'SBJ/1') because each of these three sound moderators ('SBJ/1', 'DB/1', and 'DRB/1') only went once to the Lab' at Huntingdon and that was on 13th August 1985, 30th August 1985, and the 20th September 1985!
How did two of these sound moderators (namely, DB/1 and SBJ/1) end up back in the relatives possession, until the day when the trial commenced?
DS Jones took possession of a sound moderator (silencer) from the scene on the 7th August 1985..
David Boutflour took possession of a second sound moderator (silencer) from the scene on the 10th August 1985...
Ann Eaton took possession of the third Sound moderator (silencer) at the scene from her brother David Boutflour on the 11th September 1985, and David Boutflour himself telephoned the police on the 12th September 1985, to inform them that he had found the silencer to the rifle!
Then of course, we have the existence of the two exhibit labels (both exhibit 9) which a part from one label only bearing the exhibit reference of 'DRB/1', the other label is marked 'DB/1' (crossed out), accompanied by the exhibit reference 'DRB/1. Ironically, 'nobody involved in the finding', 'handling', or 'examination of these two exhibits' signed their signatures on each of the two labels!
There is more, because according to DI Cook, when he took the first of these three Sound moderators ('SBJ/1') to the lab' at huntingdon, Cook stated that because that particular silencer did not have any exhibit label attached to it at all, so he attached one himself marking it exhibit reference 'SJ/1', because at that stage he was not aware that Ds Jones had a middle christian name of 'Stanley', or 'Stan'. There then follows on, even more confusion and conflict because he states that both he and Glynis Howard had signed that exhibit Label ('SJ/1), however, their individual signatures only appear on One of the two disclosed exhibit labels, and the label which bears their signatures is not labelled as exhibit reference 'SJ/1'..
Cook must have labelled the first Sound moderator exhibit 'SJ/1' because he knew that at 11.15am, on the first morning of the investigations that Jones had returned to the scene to collect a silencer ( irrespective of whether or not, he knew that DS Jones had a middle christian name!
So where is the original exhibit label marked 'SJ/1', with DI Cooks and Glynis Howards signatures upon them!
Even more confusion surrounds the lab' item reference numbers for each of the three Sound moderators, item No. 22, and or Item No. 23, interchangeable depending upon which lab' documentation one cares to look at or investigate! In some documents the same sound moderator, is labelled Lab' item No. 22 and Lab' item No. 23. Exactly how it could be possible for one or other of these three sound moderators coukd have the same Lab' item No. of another sound Moderator when none of the three sound moderators in question were all present at Huntingdon Lab' at the same time, or on the same date?
The third sound moderator, for example, could never have been allocated Lab' item 23, because exhibit 'DRB/1' did not arrive at the Lab' until the 20th September 1985, by which time other items of evidential value had already been allocated Item Lab' No.'s, higher in sequence than 22, and or 23..
They faked the whole sound moderator evidence, and made out that the red paint and the blood were found upon and inside the third sound moderator, but that which cannot possibly have been true, or is true.
The more I look, the more I keep finding glaring holes in the police, relatives, scientists and the prosecutions reliance upon the suggestion that a sound moderator was fitted to the rifle, when Neville Bamber got murdered downstairs in the kitchen because of the red paint from scratch-marks only found a month later, and only photographed a month later, and the blood found inside a sound moderator ('DB/1') almost a week prior to the third sound moderator ('DRB/1') arriving at the Lab' (20th September 1985)...
DI Cook claimed he fingerprinted the first silencer twice once on the 15th August 1985, and again on a second occasion, on the 23rd August 1985, when he carried out another fingerprint examination of the same sound moderator! Yet, according to the documentary evidence,' DS Davison' and 'DS Eastwood' fingerprinted the third silencer 'DRB/1' on the 13th September 1985, at a time when had there only been one sound moderator, it would have by that stage already have arrived at the Lab' earlier on the 30th November 1985 - so how could 'DS Davison' and 'DS Eastwood' still have possession of the exact same silencer two weeks or so, back at Headquarters, if it had been sent to the Lab' on 30th August 1985...
I will update this matter in due course...