0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
And you are saying ?
The point I am making is that they are not stating Sheila had one gunshot wound. You could imply they meant such but that's not at all convincing. Some would even consider that dishonest. Don't you think?
Yes I did agree to a certain extent . But they do say they have more evidence to back it up . But on all of this I am not jumping up and down for joy. But I do think something is brewing . I am hoping they are not showing their full hand in the papers.
Nope. As far as the one shot is concerned. They have mentioned 6 statements. So far we have seen half of them. It would be a fools errand for me to search and scrutinize the other half.All these documents and witnesses were avaliable for Rivlin/Terzeon at trial also.
Here are the relevant parts of the witness statements of DCS Harris and Miller that are mentioned in the recent Guardian article. "An entry wound" and "the wound" 🙄 Should I even bother looking at the other three?
Does anyone seriously believe that the police shot Sheila by accident?
How was the later 2nd wound inflicted ?
Either by Sheila shooting herself or Jeremy shooting her.
So why does the above statement say "The Wound" ?