0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.
The Guardian is on Jeremy's side.
I’ve got to say, I’m still with mike on this one. I’m going to need some serious convincing Sheila was already dead before the police stormed the building.
Nothing new. This is all based on Dr Craig's lousy work. He simply didn't see the second gun shot wound. He never checked Sheila's body temperature or any means to ascertain a time of death. He spent less than a quarter of an hour inside the house. All he did was kick the bodies to see if they were dead then gave Bamber wiskey. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe he was Grahams GP at one point. And the guy liked to drink a lot it seemed.
Where's DI Miller's pocketbook? He was the one who reported seeing one bullet injury as well as the one who found Sheila on the bed, according to David Shaw.
That is correct. He did like his drink and put the time of death all at the same time that is the time he examined the bodies, My father in law was a policeman in the London river police and used to attend a lot of crime scenes. At one time he attended a scene where the doctor present was not sure of the time of death. My father inlaw placed his had upon the victim's abdomen which was still warm. He told me that the abdomen is the last place on the body that loses heat. I wonder whether Dr. Craig could have been more precie in his estimation ofd the time of death? Because by the time the bodies had reached the post mortem it would have been too late to estimate time of death. So yes I believe that Dr. Craig was a bit lazy in his examination.
I wonder why the CT are mainly repeating old news. Just to keep it all in the public eye I guess . Still don’t think it does them any favours .
Some of the stuff they claim is actually effective but for the wrong reasons. There are people new to the case that believe in JBs innocence because they heard about Nevils alleged call. In the same way people new to the case think JB is guilty because he had crispy put down.