0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I wonder whether, over the years, Jeremy's published letters have provided EP with pointers on how to manage the case to their own ends. Also, are letters from prison either scrutinised as a matter of procedure or otherwise intercepted, ie covertly?
I agree when things are released before appeal it gives time to make up,excuses . Let’s hope is not the case with today’s news
They were never as hot on info as they send to be. Jeremy and I used to be able to send cassette tapes to each other, they were listened too, for sure! One letter was refused permission to be forwarded to me for what it contained and I have had a couple of letters blacked out. I was not worthy of the information seemingly and Jeremy was not permitted to discuss it with me.
I agree. Would so love to see EP come a cropper on this case. Not out of malice towards EP - but just to demonstrate that every dog has his day, even if it only comes around after 35 years.
Interesting. I do think Mark Higgs was right, when he asserted that the case is actively managed, even to this day. Not only in an admin sense
I stumbled upon a letter today sent to me by Jeremy, it was amongst a pile of other letters from him to me, dealing with documents and issues in his case...In this particular correspondence, he refers to two very important issues, in particular, the red paint issues, and the dodgy Sound Moderator debacle..