so nothing concrete then. it defies belief really doesn’t it. i think he should have another trial and all evidence should be on the table although i do understand a lot has either been destroyed or degraded but still enough to have a proper trial.
The silencer evidence was pretty concrete at the time, and it's still pretty compelling. If the silencer really was in the cupboard, the idea that Sheila put it there is not impossible, but it does require a lot of imagination to see her doing that.
Julie's testimony has never changed - she never retracted it, and if it was influencial on the jury, that hasn't changed.
All the other stuff about Jeremy's demeanour, his lifestyle, the bicycle, whether or not he should have phoned 999, etc - it's all interesting but it's not evidence.