Author Topic: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices  (Read 2523 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #30 on: January 31, 2020, 10:27:PM »
The so-called circumstantial evidence was just fluff. The real issues were the silencer and Julie's testimony.

so nothing concrete then. it defies belief really doesn’t it. i think he should have another trial and all evidence should be on the table although i do understand a lot has either been destroyed or degraded but still enough to have a proper trial.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12830
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #31 on: January 31, 2020, 10:30:PM »
so nothing concrete then. it defies belief really doesn’t it. i think he should have another trial and all evidence should be on the table although i do understand a lot has either been destroyed or degraded but still enough to have a proper trial.
There isn't really. All the Jeremy supporters can do is to keep the case high profile in the hope that the Establishment will tire of the thorn in its flesh.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44162
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #32 on: January 31, 2020, 10:34:PM »
It rests on the silencer.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12830
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #33 on: January 31, 2020, 10:37:PM »
It rests on the silencer.
Yes it's probably your best bet, not harrowing Julie.

Offline JackieD

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #34 on: January 31, 2020, 11:00:PM »
Yes it's probably your best bet, not harrowing Julie.

‘Harrowing’
From Colin Caffells
His relationship with Sheila was one of brotherly love. He was very proud of having a beautiful sister who was a photographic model

Offline JackieD

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #35 on: January 31, 2020, 11:05:PM »
‘Harrowing’

Well if all the relatives and guilters got together and demanded all the witheld information was released it things might be decided once and for all
But they don’t fight to get this witheld evidence released for obviously won’t

If they are all convinced JB is guilty why not.
From Colin Caffells
His relationship with Sheila was one of brotherly love. He was very proud of having a beautiful sister who was a photographic model

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12830
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #36 on: January 31, 2020, 11:05:PM »
‘Harrowing’

harrow

cause distress to.


"Todd could take it, whereas I'm harrowed by it"

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #37 on: January 31, 2020, 11:26:PM »
so nothing concrete then. it defies belief really doesn’t it. i think he should have another trial and all evidence should be on the table although i do understand a lot has either been destroyed or degraded but still enough to have a proper trial.

The silencer evidence was pretty concrete at the time, and it's still pretty compelling. If the silencer really was in the cupboard, the idea that Sheila put it there is not impossible, but it does require a lot of imagination to see her doing that.

Julie's testimony has never changed - she never retracted it, and if it was influencial on the jury, that hasn't changed.

All the other stuff about Jeremy's demeanour, his lifestyle, the bicycle, whether or not he should have phoned 999, etc - it's all interesting but it's not evidence.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44162
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #38 on: February 01, 2020, 11:45:AM »
 Everyone was looking to try and find something to nail JB, all had their own reasons for doing so and the only one who didn't have a reason/motive was Jeremy himself who hadn't a clue what was being PLANNED behind his back. Not the sharpest, was he ??

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 29947
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #39 on: February 01, 2020, 11:50:AM »
Everyone was looking to try and find something to nail JB, all had their own reasons for doing so and the only one who didn't have a reason/motive was Jeremy himself who hadn't a clue what was being PLANNED behind his back. Not the sharpest, was he ??

Or simply had no interest in the people who were forming those opinions?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44162
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #40 on: February 01, 2020, 12:21:PM »
Or simply had no interest in the people who were forming those opinions?






They had even less interest in him ! Except for his worth.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #41 on: February 01, 2020, 12:31:PM »
IMO, some people involved in this business had more faces than the town clock.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #42 on: February 01, 2020, 12:35:PM »
IMO, some people involved in this business had more faces than the town clock.

I agree . It’s hard to find witnesses who have not a vested interest or changed their minds depending on. Which way the wind blows .

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 29947
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #43 on: February 01, 2020, 01:25:PM »





They had even less interest in him ! Except for his worth.


Most of us don't feel unreserved affection for ALL our relatives.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44162
Re: Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices
« Reply #44 on: February 01, 2020, 01:40:PM »

Most of us don't feel unreserved affection for ALL our relatives.






Of course, they weren't/aren't really his are they ?? Makes a difference where money/properties are concerned.