Author Topic: Discussion on motive  (Read 2587 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 26934
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #30 on: January 23, 2020, 11:18:PM »
How did he evade injury?

He was on the other side of a rifle.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10312
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #31 on: January 23, 2020, 11:18:PM »


Yes, I agree with that. His plan sucked, and it's amazing that it worked as well as it did.

Well somehow he seemed to avoid totally a forensic trail so that’s quite an achievement.

Offline Real justice

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4770
    • Trial related photographs
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #32 on: January 23, 2020, 11:19:PM »
How did he evade injury?
Ha Ha Roch I’m not going down that road again mate, we’ve had many a argument about Sheila’s marks 👍. Let’s be friends 🙈

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 26934
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #33 on: January 23, 2020, 11:21:PM »
Well somehow he seemed to avoid totally a forensic trail so that’s quite an achievement.

As did Sheila.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Roch

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11052
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2020, 11:24:PM »
He was on the other side of a rifle.

Is that it?  It took multiple shots to put all three adults down.  All three adults have fight injuries.  But Bamber has none.  Who were they fighting with?  It cant have been Jeremy - he's unmarked. 

What would have happened if somebody landed a punch or gouge on him?  Game over.  Go to jail.  Do not collect inheritance.

The whole prosecution case is absurd. 

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2020, 11:25:PM »
Obviously, nobody can know what the plan actually was, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't to stop and reload the magazine twice. He had 11 bullets max, and the plan must have been to kill them all with that number of bullets, which was unrealistic unless he really targeted the right places. The rifle wasn't that powerful, it was designed to kill small animals, not humans.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10312
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2020, 11:27:PM »
As did Sheila.

Did she though ?

She would not exactly had clothes to destroy or hide her exit would she .

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 29625
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2020, 11:28:PM »
Is that it?  It took multiple shots to put all three adults down.  All three adults have fight injuries.  But Bamber has none.  Who were they fighting with?  It cant have been Jeremy - he's unmarked. 

What would have happened if somebody landed a punch or gouge on him?  Game over.  Go to jail.  Do not collect inheritance.

The whole prosecution case is absurd.

See, if every potential crim went sown that road, no crimes would ever be committed. They ALL believe they have a master plan. They don't think like you.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10312
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2020, 11:32:PM »
Obviously, nobody can know what the plan actually was, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't to stop and reload the magazine twice. He had 11 bullets max, and the plan must have been to kill them all with that number of bullets, which was unrealistic unless he really targeted the right places. The rifle wasn't that powerful, it was designed to kill small animals, not humans.

But apparently he balanced that against a shotgun that would make more noise , poisonings and arson .

I honestly think if he is guilty Julie was part of the plan and was going to gain financially .

IMO.



Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 26934
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #39 on: January 23, 2020, 11:34:PM »
But apparently he balanced that against a shotgun that would make more noise , poisonings and arson .

I honestly think if he is guilty Julie was part of the plan and was going to gain financially .

IMO.

I would agree with part of that actually.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 26934
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #40 on: January 23, 2020, 11:34:PM »
I would agree with part of that actually.

Or think it's a possibility.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10312
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #41 on: January 23, 2020, 11:37:PM »
Well it makes sense . Then she wanted to don him in as she realised she was not going to make any money but she has to think of a crazy story so not to implicate herself .


Unfortunately though either way that makes her a liar .

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21417
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #42 on: January 24, 2020, 09:22:AM »
So why risk the end goal by telling Julie ?

Or do you think she was actually a partner in crime ?

He told Julie because she was his girlfriend.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10312
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #43 on: January 24, 2020, 12:26:PM »
He told Julie because she was his girlfriend.

oh so you think this womanising allegedly bi-sexual preditor intended to stay with her forever and trusted her 100%

so he told her thinking he was safe and then started chatting up another woman

interesting .

shame because if he had had paid her some money she probably would not have dobbed him in.

you do seem to have a very varied opinion of his personality traits

Offline Real justice

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4770
    • Trial related photographs
Re: Discussion on motive
« Reply #44 on: January 24, 2020, 12:31:PM »
oh so you think this womanising allegedly bi-sexual preditor intended to stay with her forever and trusted her 100%

so he told her thinking he was safe and then started chatting up another woman

interesting .

shame because if he had had paid her some money she probably would not have dobbed him in.

you do seem to have a very varied opinion of his personality traits
He did pay her and she still dobbed him 😂