Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber trial examination  (Read 1500 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 41185
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #165 on: November 17, 2019, 09:25:PM »
But lookout there was no issue regarding access! For goodness sake..





It was brewing Steve. Until it erupted.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5761
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #166 on: November 17, 2019, 09:28:PM »


Interesting that in one day, you seem to have felt misunderstood by three different people. Perhaps it's not entirely with them that the fault lays.

Please stop goading and discuss the subject. That's what this forum is for.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 28235
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #167 on: November 17, 2019, 09:38:PM »
Please stop goading and discuss the subject. That's what this forum is for.


You'd do well to take your own advice, but you've been hell bent on insulting me at every opportunity today

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5761
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #168 on: November 17, 2019, 09:40:PM »

You'd do well to take your own advice, but you've been hell bent on insulting me at every opportunity today

Please stop goading. Save it for the playground.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 28235
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #169 on: November 17, 2019, 09:41:PM »
Please stop goading. Save it for the playground.


I'm perfectly willing to do exactly what you do.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5761
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #170 on: November 17, 2019, 09:42:PM »

I'm perfectly willing to do exactly what you do.

You're clearly not at all interested in the subject matter, so you're not worth bothering with.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 28235
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #171 on: November 17, 2019, 09:53:PM »
You're clearly not at all interested in the subject matter, so you're not worth bothering with.


And you don't goad? Like many others who've joined for a period and disappeared, I suspect your reason, as was theirs, is to cause trouble.  As you've already claimed not to like my style of writing and you think I'm not worth bothering about -is there anything else you wish to criticize?- I suggest you do what I suggested earlier and put me on ignore.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 25050
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #172 on: November 18, 2019, 12:14:AM »
Of course I am. They had joint custody, so Sheila could make decisions and demands at any time. If Colin had sole custody, she would only have access rights.

As already stated, he didn't mention custody, he didn't seek custody but he did have control.
Few people have the imagination for reality