Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber trial examination  (Read 1431 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ilovebooze

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« on: November 10, 2019, 07:24:PM »
Does anybody have the arlidge, Bamber trial transcript??

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11329
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2019, 07:39:PM »
Does anybody have the arlidge, Bamber trial transcript??
No there's no full trial transcript, but Roger Wilkes' book Blood Relations covers it and it's a good read.

Offline ilovebooze

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2019, 08:17:PM »
No there's no full trial transcript, but Roger Wilkes' book Blood Relations covers it and it's a good read.
does it just cover the famous point where arlidge accuses Jeremy of lying where he famously responds " that is what you have got to establish" or does it go more in depth ??

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11329
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2019, 08:38:PM »
does it just cover the famous point where arlidge accuses Jeremy of lying where he famously responds " that is what you have got to establish" or does it go more in depth ??
Well it's a summary but a detailed one (Chapters 27-35). In total Jeremy Bamber spent eight hours in the witness box.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7455
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2019, 08:42:PM »
How can Roger Wilkes write details about Jeremys testimony when no transcript of it exists?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11329
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2019, 08:47:PM »
How can Roger Wilkes write details about Jeremys testimony when no transcript of it exists?
I meant no official record. There would have been journalistic sources Wilkes used. By the way, don't forget James Richards testified that Jeremy told him: "I hate my f***ing parents." Not so far removed from the remark RB alleges.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7455
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2019, 08:53:PM »
I meant no official record. There would have been journalistic sources Wilkes used. By the way, don't forget James Richards testified that Jeremy told him: "I hate my f***ing parents." Not so far removed from the remark RB alleges.



Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11329
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2019, 08:57:PM »

David this meme does you a disservice. Members don't behave in this way. If you can find an official transcript then go ahead and post it.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2019, 08:58:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline ilovebooze

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2019, 09:00:PM »
Ihow can we have witnessed court evidence and not Jeremy's??

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11329
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2019, 09:12:PM »
Ihow can we have witnessed court evidence and not Jeremy's??
There would have been notetakers. I don't know what all the fuss is about.

Offline ilovebooze

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2019, 09:20:PM »
I meant no official record. There would have been journalistic sources Wilkes used. By the way, don't forget James Richards testified that Jeremy told him: "I hate my f***ing parents." Not so far removed from the remark RB alleges.
got to pick up on this for essence, in the grand scheme of things what does they saying " I fucking hate my parents amount to" I've said it on countless occasions in younger years in a strop as of millions of other early twenties, adolescents have....
« Last Edit: November 10, 2019, 09:21:PM by ilovebooze »

Offline ilovebooze

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2019, 09:22:PM »
There would have been notetakers. I don't know what all the fuss is about.
stereonographer??

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 25013
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2019, 12:21:PM »
How can Roger Wilkes write details about Jeremys testimony when no transcript of it exists?

There will have been a transcript. Doubt you’d be able to get a copy now but even if you could, it would cost a fortune.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20925
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2019, 02:17:PM »
David this meme does you a disservice. Members don't behave in this way. If you can find an official transcript then go ahead and post it.

I did recommend that a forum rule should be made that offensive & disrespecful pictures & signs should not be allowed. Not just to apply to  David, as Roch has done it as well. But to everyone.

The response was very negative which is why David still does it.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20925
Re: Jeremy Bamber trial examination
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2019, 02:29:PM »
No there's no full trial transcript, but Roger Wilkes' book Blood Relations covers it and it's a good read.

Do you know if any of the other books do? Not that the other books would add much as Wilkes's overview is good.

Wilkes's book also gives a good report of the judges summing up.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.