Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.

[David1819]

I haven't seen the above quote anywhere - can you please provide an independent source for it. I'm not asking to be difficult, I would just like to confirm where it comes from?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7303.msg346366.html#msg346366

[David1819]

Yes that was first brought up earlier this week.

David does write a lot of things in bold or red. To try to give his posts more gravitas. However what is actually written is often rubbish.

Either that or he is putting up offensive images or 'gish gash' quotes when frustrated. Ignoring moderator instructions.

Hopefully David will improve as a poster.

Everything I post in bold,italics and colour is text quoted from elsewhere. Its serves to differentiate between my claims and evidence I use to support those claims. It makes my posts easier read/understand plus I am a bit OCD on how I present stuff.  No harm done.

There is nothing wrong about posting images or exposing the dishonest and fallacious debate tactic you use.

For example

[ilovebooze]

I can give instance of a woman who only recognized, in her mid 40's, the abuse she'd suffered as a child, and the subsequent effect it had had on her as an adult. Most of us are too busy trying to make the best of the cards we've been dealt to look at what's going on. As you say, RJ, we can only draw on our own experiences. I find ilb's stance to be particularly judgemental but it MAY be that he/she has had a very sheltered life, or has had one devoid of the traumas many have faced.

just seen this. If you haven't already gathered it's a He. And I haven't had a sheltered life, and i have faced traumas. Who hasn't at some stage?

[Caroline]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7303.msg346366.html#msg346366

Cheers, do you know what newspaper it was from?

[Caroline]

Everything I post in bold,italics and colour is text quoted from elsewhere. Its serves to differentiate between my claims and evidence I use to support those claims. It makes my posts easier read/understand plus I am a bit OCD on how I present stuff.  No harm done.

There is nothing wrong about posting images or exposing the dishonest and fallacious debate tactic you use.

For example

I understand that you post quotes in red etc. it would be just helpful if you said where it was quoted from.

[Steve_uk]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7303.msg346366.html#msg346366

A glove came off in the fight with Nevill. NOT released to the press.

[Adam]

The defence are suggesting Julie got the information not in the press from the police. This must be prior to her approach to SJ. Otherwise they are saying the police were corrupt.

They are also suggesting AE somehow found this out. Then somehow passed it onto Julie. Did she do it by email or text?

[Adam]

I understand that you post quotes in red etc. it would be just helpful if you said where it was quoted from.

Everyone can read everyones posts. Not sure why David wants to post in red or bold so much.

But he does need to provide sources. No matter how strange.