Author Topic: More dirty tricks by AE?  (Read 536 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 41036
Re: More dirty tricks by AE?
« Reply #45 on: November 06, 2019, 06:16:PM »
Lookout, even with discalculia, I KNOW that the answer can't be "lemons" coz they don't come into the equation. I believe it goes something like MPH+D over T. Given my difficulty, I doubt it was I who started the conversation.




Difficulty ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 24783
Re: More dirty tricks by AE?
« Reply #46 on: November 06, 2019, 07:30:PM »
Its important to note that Jeremy was only timing this call according to Ann Eaton. 

This thread here is an interesting read.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1931.msg59842.html#msg59842

She managed to hear Jeremy say all kinds of things nobody else did. Even things the police officers never heard him say when taking his statements.

She was there longer, the others were in and out and not everyone is going to report hearing the same information.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Reader

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2361
Re: More dirty tricks by AE?
« Reply #47 on: November 07, 2019, 02:56:PM »
I believe it goes something like MPH+D over T.
Although MPH = D over T is valid, it's easier to use an online calculator.