the witneses concerned did actully know jodi so it can be defanatly established thatit was jodithey saw being follwed by somebodygoingtowards a place where her bodywas later found.
anyone who thinks thats not signifcant needs a brain transplant
Are we not joining the dots correctly?
What do you make of Luke's hair colour - very dark almost black hair when younger. Dirty blonde in his photo ID pic in August.
Brown in the media pics and brown in this ponytail ones from court. One can easily see how on a dull, wet day this hair can
be mistaken for being dark, maybe reddish - definitely with sticky out clumpy bits.
How often did he wear that hair band, flattening his hair to his head, making the bottom and back - clumpy and sticking out.
And his love of course for military style clothing, khaki green with German badges. And of course high boots.
Thinking here also of AB's brother in law - of his mention of army style clothing and of this fisherman type jacket.
AB appears to have said somewhere in all of this, something of military style clothing?
When It comes to evidence that clearly shows, for the majority that Luke and Jodi were the couple witnessed at the entrance to this path,
the wrongful identification of this male, the non confirmation of time and indeed of this even being Jodi rightfully goes on the back burner.
The police clearly did try to establish if this merited further investigation. In the hope that, If this was Jodi then this male may have been
able to provide further information on the sighting of her with Luke.
What is abundantly clear is that one of these witnesses were completely wrong in their identification.
Marty clearly states either this or the other witness - picked this guy out from carrying this girls coffin.
You are stating this witness knew Jodi yet was not at her funeral? as they picked this male out from seeing the funeral via a media source.
Feasible to say that this witness did not know this girl well enough that she did not know her close family.
And the tying of different witnesses into one - the sighting of Jodi on Easthouse's road by someone who knew Jodi - comes under Ms Leans
calculations of an 8minute walk to the entrance of this path - clearly the main R'd that leads up to Mayfield.
The same sighting that takes in a trip to the local shops, of two sets of steps - heading in the other direction?
If you are now attempting to say, that one of the witnesses with this male in view - knew Jodi, then why did the police not mention this in any appeal.
They clearly gave descriptions of a girl who may have been Jodi, not one that they knew this to be Jodi? I could be wrong, if I am then you will have to
excuse me - it is rather difficult to keep track, very messy.
This article is obviously full of flaws -
They state it is Jodi, the police state it may have been, they state her mother put out a public appeal - not the aunts.
They do state this was around 5pm and not after or before.
The police - clearly by the 17th of July were looking to further establish the sighting by AB - Luke was the main suspect.
They did however and rightly so - choose to seek this male for information and elimination purpose.
You will have to excuse me here, if I choose to take the investigation account over that of Ms Leans, Ms Mitchells or indeed yourself Nugnug.
It is far fetched to the extreme - a complete mis-match of one liners from multiple statements. Blatant wrongful information and wild theories.
It is hardly surprising the level of support gained from this - 'there was semen and sperm from about 10 men all over the body'
"there was a mystery man seen following this girl up the path" "The sisters boyfriend was there around the TOD" " The cousin cut his hair to look like
someone on the bike" "how easy would it be to take a bike, a knife, bloody clothing, chuck it in a van, put it in a crusher and gone forever" Not any old bike of course
the one that was impossibly seen at this V in the wall - Not that Ms Mitchell is pointing any fingers here. Just highlighting her and Ms Leans theory.
There is no parka jacket but if there was - it is possibly MK's. "The search trio HAD to walk directly passed YW's" "The search trio were out searching for someone else"
It is the same mismatched placed theories for over a decade - started by Jigsawman - Ms Lean?
Brain transplant - the positive ID of the male, via a funeral then confessed to this murder. OK. Maybe I do require one, unlike the majority of intellectual support,
do I appear to be joining the dots incorrectly?