0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I would understand if you were advocating for a genuine MOJ case.
you have a real problem withwomen dont you.
oh dear have i hit a nerve.
Sandra have you ever spoken to Shane Mitchell?
Yes
and you are single judge of what is and isint a moj are you.
If the evidence shows someone is guilty I am not going to be dishonest with those who support that person.
not gokng to be dishonest is that why you made up a load of crap about a forensic breakthrough.and then evaded all ustins about it.
I never made up anything and I had the patience to answer your obtuse questions.
so you never been cougt making up qautes on here.
The fundraiser was not to fund a "legal defence" - Luke's been incarcerated for almost 16 years. It was to fund a case review, something for which there is no legal aid.As for needing help with the house bills, the film that was put up with the fundraiser made it perfectly clear - I have to work full-time like everybody else, but we need this work done urgently. What I was asking was that people pay for hours that I could "swap out" from my contracted hours (at a 25% reduction in my pay rate) so that I could work more hours on the case.So you tell me, David1819, how does a 25% pay cut help with the bills?