0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
He didn't say that. You're mistaken if you think you found that in the archives. Ann Eaton may have mentioned 10 or 11 minutes, but in relation to the response time of the police, not the length of the early morning call to Julie.Julie's statement says he said that, but in relation to an earlier call, not the early morning call.
I wasn't talking about the early morning call!
Neither was Jane - you have just assumed!
Jane wrote "He even told Julie how many minutes their call had lasted." Why would Jane refer, without clarification, to an earlier call to Julie that hadn't previously been mentioned in this thread? In any case, where is the evidence that Jeremy said he timed that earlier call?
How do you know that Jane was referring to the earlier call that hadn't previously been mentioned?
You weren't part of the initial discussion. Your first post occurred well over an hour later. You used the "know" with emphasis, but seem merely to be stating your opinion.
Then ask her - but I KNOW which call she was referring to.
But she was going by Susan's digital clock. That was always running fast.
Well you should know, shouldn't you ? If you don't know by now you never will. I've never known two people who work so closely together ! Conjoined.
Did she make allowance for its inaccuracy, though?
Jane is a friend Lookout - remember them?
I should do because at the moment I can't keep up. Outside of here of course !
