If true, cops, public witnesses, lab' experts, members of the judiciary, and the CPS, all made a minimum of four mistakes / errors, ('SBJ/1', 'SJ/1', 'DB/1', 'AE/1') and subsequently, ('DRB/1') concerning the exhibit reference of the same Sound Moderator / Silencer?
What?
Hang on a moment...
Consider the following - One Sound Moderator / Silencer, taken or found by a police officer, or a relative, and examined at the Lab' by so called 'scientific experts' in various fields of 'expertise'..
So, how come then, that at the commencement of the trial of Jeremy Bamber on 2nd October 1986, at Chelmsford Crown Court, that 'a motor cycle outrider' (unidentified), collected 'two additional Sound Moderator / Silencers' from the relatives and conveyed them to Chelmsford Crown Court, 'at' the behest of the CPS?
Why, and by whom?
Additionally, there was already 'a Sound Moderator / Silencer at the court, 'DRB/1' ( court exhibit no. 9 , a Sound Moderator / Silencer), making it a total of 'three different / separate Sound Moderator / silencers', in court on the first day of the trial, and yet 'the court was led to believe there only existed one'?
'Why' was the existence, or involvement of 'at least an additional two Sound Moderator / Silencers', kept from 'the court', and in particular, 'the jury' - kept from 'everyone'?
But there's more..