Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?

[David1819]

Such things are difficult to fathom, however, we do not know police procedure in such instances.

Why did West not mention Nevills call in his August 9th statement?

[Roch]

Why did West not mention Nevills call in his August 9th statement?

Is his August 9th statement not a re-typed one, done on 13th Sept, or whenever it was were Ainsley oversaw a mass typing up of statements?  The police are hardly going to allow a 9th Aug statement referencing a call from Nevill come to light, are they?

[lookout]

There doesn't need to have been a " frame up " as such but a bad human error which was never put right meaning that everything that followed would then have to fit in accordingly----which it did as soon as the extended family came onto the scene, much to the relief of EP.

It was noted that quite a few PO statements had been written uncannily the same. 

[David1819]

Is his August 9th statement not a re-typed one, done on 13th Sept, or whenever it was were Ainsley oversaw a mass typing up of statements? The police are hardly going to allow a 9th Aug statement that references Nevill phoning them, to come to light, are they?

You have no evidence for Ainsley committing such a ludicrous conspiracy. Taff Jones was still very much on the case then also.

So I will ask again. Why did West not mention Nevills call in his August 9th statement? and while you are here explain why Taff Jones never told Robert Boutflour about Nevills call?

[lookout]

You have no evidence for Ainsley committing such a ludicrous conspiracy. Taff Jones was still very much on the case then also.

So I will ask again. Why did West not mention Nevills call in his August 9th statement? and while you are here explain why Taff Jones never told Robert Boutflour about Nevills call?

I know both the ones mentioned in your last paragraph are dead, but how will we ever know whether " Taff " Jones told RWB about the call from Nevill or not ? We've got very little, if anything on what " Taff " said/wrote.

[Kaldin]

Is his August 9th statement not a re-typed one, done on 13th Sept, or whenever it was were Ainsley oversaw a mass typing up of statements?  The police are hardly going to allow a 9th Aug statement referencing a call from Nevill come to light, are they?

Do you have any evidence that West's statement of 9th August was actually made in September?

[David1819]

Do you have any evidence that West's statement of 9th August was actually made in September?

West made two statements. One in August and the other in September. His latter statement mentions his August statement.

 

[Caroline]

Is his August 9th statement not a re-typed one, done on 13th Sept, or whenever it was were Ainsley oversaw a mass typing up of statements?  The police are hardly going to allow a 9th Aug statement referencing a call from Nevill come to light, are they?

So you're assuming that West was involved in this 'mass' typing? So why does the time still state 03:36 on his log? This apparently now works in Jeremy's favour - but back then it didn't - so which is it?

[Caroline]

If Nevill rang the police implicating Sheila. There are no inferences to draw from Jeremy actions as he cannot be guilty anyway.

What needs to be addressed is the absence of any phone log from Nevill to the police operator. The timings that simply make it impossible, West and Bonnet making no mention of a call from Nevill. The police suppressing such a call from Jeremy's relatives ect ect.

We're going to have to agree to disagree here. This premise asks us to suspend what has gone before and includes ALL that Jeremy initially reported. You can't just wipe the sale clean and start again. Jeremy's account is still part of the case and what he said and did are still relevant. The notion that Neill called, is just that so they need to explain how the new fits with the old. You may not think so, but I was asking those who believe that Nevill called, to explain. And while we're on, I'll ask again - when did Jeremy call Julie in this 'new' version of events?

[Kaldin]

So you're assuming that West was involved in this 'mass' typing? So why does the time still state 03:36 on his log? This apparently now works in Jeremy's favour - but back then it didn't - so which is it?

He put 3.26 in his statement of 9th August, and 3.36 in his statement of 13th September.

[lookout]

He put 3.26 in his statement of 9th August, and 3.36 in his statement of 13th September.

A bit like the silencer debacle, eh ? Who found what and when.

[Caroline]

He put 3.26 in his statement of 9th August, and 3.36 in his statement of 13th September.

Obviously because he had learned he put the wrong time on the log. He stated in his court testimony that he was informed he wrote the wrong time.

[Caroline]

A bit like the silencer debacle, eh ? Who found what and when.

It really is quite simply but complicating it makes it easier to look like a conspiracy.

West took the call from Jeremy around 03:25 - this supports what Jeremy initially stated. West probably forgot to write the time down initially and added it later or just made a mistake. At that point, he wouldn't have though that 33 years later it was still being debated and his own comments as to what happened would be disregarded and new theories applied.

[lookout]

Well, sadly and horrifically there's yet another bigger hurdle for EP to overcome than think about something that happened 34 years ago, so there'll be nothing forthcoming from them for the next 12 months or so.

RIP to the poor souls who've perished. 

[Kaldin]

Obviously because he had learned he put the wrong time on the log. He stated in his court testimony that he was informed he wrote the wrong time.

But he put 3.26 in his first statement, and then changed it to 3.36 in his later statement.