Author Topic: bryson sighting.  (Read 353 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7392
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2019, 05:38:PM »
This is really getting desperate now.

You are not searching for the truth. Give up already.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2019, 05:46:PM »
This is really getting desperate now.

You are not searching for the truth. Give up already.

in wht way pointing out that an alleged descrption is completly wrong.

she has jodi waring the wrong colour jacket says jodi is wearing jeans when she clearly wasnt how can any sane person describe that as an  eye witness sighing.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7392
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2019, 06:57:PM »
Since Sandra drip fed the forum six sentences from a 39 page document last night, it once again shows that she can in fact post case material on here (despite her claims to the contrary).

Thus there is nothing to stop her posting Bryson's statements and trial testimony in full for us all to  scrutinise ourselves. She wont post them because they further confirm Luke's guilt. So at best we get a distorted advocacy piece with a few quotes few and far between.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2019, 07:08:PM »
Since Sandra drip fed the forum six sentences from a 39 page document last night, it once again shows that she can in fact post case material on here (despite her claims to the contrary).

Thus there is nothing to stop her posting Bryson's statements and trial testimony in full for us all to  scrutinise ourselves. She wont post them because they further confirm Luke's guilt. So at best we get a distorted advocacy piece with a few quotes few and far between.

her evdence is allready availble if you can be bohred to do a google its in the link i posted.

she failed to describe jodis clothes correctly thats not from sandra thats fom the daily herlad.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2019, 07:10:PM by nugnug »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11232
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2019, 07:30:PM »
This is really getting desperate now.

You are not searching for the truth. Give up already.
Anybody who claims innocence after 14 years behind bars deserves to be heard. I do agree with you about posting all the relevant documents. It's also harder to judge without being in the courtroom at the time of the trial.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2019, 07:48:PM »
Anybody who claims innocence after 14 years behind bars deserves to be heard. I do agree with you about posting all the relevant documents. It's also harder to judge without being in the courtroom at the time of the trial.

ive posted a link with the relvant imformation.

in it but david for some reason has chosn ignore it.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 910
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2019, 09:30:PM »
I've made this crystal clear several times. I can post excerpts from documents but I cannot post the full documents online. I know it's different south of the border but here in Scotland, I can't do it. No amount of repeating requests and demands is going to change that, I'm sorry.

If I could, I would post the whole lot without a minute's hesitation - it would certainly make my life a whole lot easier!

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2019, 09:39:PM »
I've made this crystal clear several times. I can post excerpts from documents but I cannot post the full documents online. I know it's different south of the border but here in Scotland, I can't do it. No amount of repeating requests and demands is going to change that, I'm sorry.

If I could, I would post the whole lot without a minute's hesitation - it would certainly make my life a whole lot easier!

you dont really need to in this case it was in the papers at the time and most are stil online.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7392
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2019, 09:46:PM »
If you can post parts of a document then you can post the whole thing. No two ways about it.


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2019, 03:05:PM »
why did her disciption of jodis clothes not match the clothes jodi was wearing.

Offline David1819

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7392
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2019, 04:03:PM »
why did her disciption of jodis clothes not match the clothes jodi was wearing.

It did match.

According to the COA Jodi had a "black or very dark navy hooded top"

"She described the girl's clothing as comprising a navy blue hooded jumper and pair of trousers ("I just took them to be a pair of jeans"); the trousers were lighter in colour than the jumper. (The description of the jumper was consistent with what the deceased was wearing when she left home; her trousers were dark in colour and of a "baggy" type). "

This witness got both the colour of Lukes top and Jodi's top correct.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2019, 04:10:PM »
jodi ws wearing a black top and black trousers her description is clearly wrong. in the artical iposted it states that.

https://media.gettyimages.com/videos/jodi-jones-murder-police-stage-reconstruction-itn-scotland-dalkeith-video-id682859452

she also fails to mention jodis deaf tones logo.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2019, 04:17:PM by nugnug »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 14956
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: bryson sighting.
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2019, 04:23:PM »
so you have the wrong time and the wrong discription of the clothes and that is aperantly a reliable witness.